According to the very latest YouGov poll commissioned by the Telegraph. 60% of voters want Gordon Brown to call a general election by the autumn rather than wait until next year.

The poll sample was a MASSIVE 5000 which must make it one of the most authoritative surveys around.

Asked when the next general election should be held, 18 per cent said Brown should go to the country within the next few weeks, 42 per cent said he should wait until the autumn, and 32 per cent believe he should wait until next year.

Voting intentions for the European elections, for those who can be arsed, show there is so little between Labour, the Lib Dems and Ukip that predicting which of them will come fourth is too close to call. While the Tories are ahead on 27 per cent, Labour is on 17 per cent, Ukip on 16 per cent and the Lib Dems 15 per cent. One unassailable fact is the rise of the BNP who appear to be on target for four MEP seats in London, the North West, the West Midlands and Yorkshire & Humber.

Brown's popularity has slumped to a staggeringly low 17% putting him somewhere between Myra Hindley and Ian Huntley in the 'would you let them babysit the kids' stake.

All the smart money seems to be looking to Alan Johnson plunging the dagger into Brown within a week of the Euro election results and pitching for a General Election in the Autumn.

What place in history for Brown?

Has there ever been an unelected Prime Minister who didn't lead his party into a General Election? Gordon, this could be your legacy...


http://tinyurl.com/mbhja5

Purcell humps Gray

The Observer has a hugely interesting interview with Stephen Purcell, the leader of Glasgow City council and king in making/MSP/First Minister of Scotland/Leader of Labour in Holyrood, according to the vested interests.

Interesting passages include the following:

"Disillusioned party activists are facing up to a generation of wandering in the wilderness, out of power and unable to stop the country sleepwalking into separatism as it grows accustomed to life under a nationalist administration."

"His words will smooth the furrowed brows of a handful of Labour MSPs, who have their eye on the national leadership after the decent but dull current leader, Iain Gray, is finally forced to leave office. Gray's fate was effectively sealed a few weeks ago when a poll showed that his recognition factor among voters was lower than that of Annabel Goldie, the redoubtable chief of the Scottish Tories. But there are influential business and media players in Scotland who want Purcell to be Labour's next first minister."

But the most telling is this comment, that effectively strolls up behind Iain Gray and guts him like a fish.


"New Labour as a brand is dead and the period of opposition we're having in Holyrood is giving us a chance to reflect on how we administer devolution. Look, there's no point in pretending that the SNP government has not done very well, given that none of their ministers had had any previous experience in government. There's no doubt the processes of devolution have been helped by having a minority government in Holyrood."

These few short words peal the death toll for New Labour and recognise what everyone in Scottish Labour knows, but wont say publicly. New Labour is Dead....Let's keep it that way.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/31/steven-purcell-glasgow-labour-elections

Major Eric Joyce, The First expenses Millionaire MP - come on down.

'This conversation may have cost me £160,000'... Major Eric Joyce, apologist in Chief for Blair on Newsnight, highest claimant on the Allowances list, claims a rented £500 a month flat in Falkirk is his main home, and his London home is his second, despite the fact that his wife works in Kent as a Head teacher and his daughters attend school there...has finally been rumbled.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1186953/This-conversation-cost-160-000-MP-claimed-1m-admits-failed-pay-capital-gains-tax.html

The Sunday Mail of all people have got him by his gineger short and curlies, painting him as a venal money grabbing, sleaze bucket. In doing so, they have managed to do what every Scottish paper knew to be the case, but singularly failed to do anything about.

The Mail on Sunday put it to him that since his wife and daughters lived at the family home in London, his wife worked as teacher in the South-East and his children have always gone to school in London, his London home must have been their main home, not their second home.

'I discussed it at great length with the Fees Office,' he said. 'There was always a possibility that we would move to Scotland.'

This sums up the Labour in Scotland for me.

"When first approached, Mr Joyce said he could not recall whether he or his wife owned the Croydon house. Nor could he recall whether he had paid capital gains tax on it."

He defended his decision not to pay capital gains tax, saying that from the point of view of the Inland Revenue, the Croydon house was genuinely his main home, not his second home.

The people of Falkirk deserve better than this poisonous dwarf, who is politics solely for the advance of his own bank balance.

Alan S, when you read this. Tell us about the good work he's done in Falkirk with his focus groups...

Malcolm Bruce and his big bright idea.

Once upon a time, there was a Wiberal Democwat called Malcolm. Malcolm had been sent to work in London by the good people's of Gordon, to represent them and make sure that no bad things happened to them.

Malcolm, bought a little flat in London, the people of Gordon paid for this.

Malcolm had an office on Inverurie, the people of Gordon paid for this.

Malcolm had a family house in Torphins - the people of Gordon paid for this...

Malcolm liked money, but didn't like dipping into his own pockets.

One day some rain dribbled into his conservatory. Malcolm decided that the people of Gordon 559 miles away, should pay for his leaky conservatory. They did, all £3,200 worth.

On another day Malcolm was sitting in his London apartment when a light bulb "EXPLODED" Malcolm was very scared. One minute light - the next utter darkness and confusion. There was only one solution, the good people of Gordon could pay for the complete rewiring of Malcolm's London pied a terre at a cost of £8757. They did

Malcolm is the President of the Wiberal Democwats in Scotland. At the next General Election, the good people of Gordon, might be tempted to hang Malcolm from an Inverurie lampost by his Liberal bollocks. Chances are they'll pay for the noose too.

The End.

'Don't tell us what we already know. Give us solutions'. Paul Martin MSP

The dilapidated and quite magnificent Springburn Winter Gardens. Waiting for someone to recognise its beauty and potential.



'Don't tell us what we already know. Give us solutions'. Paul Martin MSP

Springburn, lovely name, redolent of countryside streams, pastoral scenes, milkmaids, randy ploughboys, meadows, butterflys, daisy chains and so on...Then the Victorian age, St Rollox, 25% of the then worlds trains, heavy industry, migration, religious divide, social deprivation, closure, mass unemployment, drinking, poverty ill health, crime...

Kenneth Roy did an excellent piece in 'The Scottish Review'.

http://www.scottishreview.net/KRoy103.html

I read on with my maw slightly agape.

School leavers with no qualifications 300 per cent higher than the Scottish average.

Teenage pregnancies – 60 per cent higher

Deaths from lung cancer – 94 per cent higher

Heart disease – 40 per cent higher

Folk on income support – 130 per cent higher than the national average

Unemployment rate – 140 per cent higher.

I couldn't quite believe these figures so checked the source.

http://www.scotpho.org.uk/nmsruntime/saveasdialog.asp?lID=2396&sID=2012

...and there it all was in black and white...or rather more blue and white.

CONSTITUENCY HEALTH REPORT 2001
A profile of the health of the people in Glasgow Springburn.

The respected academic authors said:

"A rounded view of this constituency would suggest that it has a considerably lower average household income, higher levels of
unemployment and a lower level of educational attainment among
school leavers compared to the Scottish average. Almost all the
health indicators compare poorly with the Scottish average, with
teenage pregnancy and lung cancer mortality being
particularly high in comparison."

They highlighted that the reason for this report:


"The aim of this profile is to focus the attention of politicians and
planners on health rather than disease, and to highlight the fact that
many factors other than medical care influence the health of
communities and individuals. It is intended to stimulate debate and
lead to action targeted at the determinants of health at a local level.
The profile is also for local residents to inform them about the
health of the constituency they live in."

The response of the elected members?



'Don't tell us what we already know. Give us solutions'. Paul Martin MSP

Amazingly enough this report was written in 2001 and presented to Martin and Son as a means of engaging them with the problems, opening it up to debate.

At the time Dad was the recently elected Speaker of the House of Commons. Possibly the most important post outside of the big three cabinet posts.

Son Paul, was midway through his first term as the local MSP and an important part of the Labour machine running Holyrood.

In the EIGHT years since this independent report was published, what have they done?

Surely, a father and son of the constituency would put their heads together and play their combined networking cards. They could have called in massive favours and brought jobs to the constituency, built new schools, invigorated the teachers, set up early intervention measures to stop teenage pregnancies, smoking heart disease.

Between them they had the means to turn around Springburn and invest some enthusiasm and ambition in it.

What did they do?

Scottish Labour Honourable Members aka the 39 Stumps

The 39 Stumps. Complete with expenses for 2007-8 Not including their salaries.

1. Douglas Alexander Paisley and Renfrewshire South Labour Party
£134,127 (487th)

2. Gordon Banks Ochil and South Perthshire Labour Party
2007-8 £171,106 (14th)

3. Anne Begg Aberdeen South Labour Party
£166,793 (34th)

4. Gordon Brown Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath Labour Party
£124,454 (575th)

5. Russell Brown Dumfries and Galloway Labour Party
£165,025 (45th)

6. Des Browne Kilmarnock and Loudoun Labour Party
£146,941 (320th)

7. David Cairns Inverclyde Labour Party
£145,976 (336th)

8. Katy Clark North Ayrshire and Arran Labour Party
£156,852 (148th)

9. Tom Clarke Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill Labour Party
£155,970 (173rd)

10. Michael Connarty Linlithgow and East Falkirk Labour Party
£183,466 (2nd)

11. Alistair Darling Edinburgh South West Labour Party
£151,904 (240th)

12. Jim Devine Livingston Labour Party
£169,133 (21st)

13. Ian Davidson Glasgow South West Labour Party
£170,014 (17th)

14. Brian Donohoe Central Ayrshire Labour Party
£163,390 (64th)

15. Frank Doran Aberdeen North Labour Party
£171,717 (11th)

16. Nigel Griffiths Edinburgh South Labour Party
£158,067 (123rd)

17. David Hamilton Midlothian Labour Party
£134,300 (484th)

18. Tom Harris Glasgow South Labour Party
£166,991 (32nd)

19. Jimmy Hood by name Lanark and Hamilton East Labour Party
£156,260 (163rd)

20. Adam Ingram East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow Labour Party 2007-8 £121,499 (591st) Remunerated directorships
Non-executive Chairman of SignPoint Secure Ltd.; emergency communications. (£45,001-£50,000)
Adam Ingram Advisory Limited, set up May 2008, to undertake consultancy work, to which is payable income from the following:
Non-executive Chairman of Argus Scotland Ltd; design and construction services in the urban environment. (£20,001-£25,000)
Director, International School for Security and Explosives Education (ISSEE) (non-executive). (£10,001-£15,000)
Consultant to Argus Libya UK LLP; design and construction services in the urban environment. (£20,001-£25,000)
Consultant to Electronic Data Systems Ltd (EDS); provision of IT services to public and private sector clients in the UK. (£50,001-£55,000)


21. Eric Joyce Falkirk Labour Party
£187,334 (1st)

22. Mark Lazarowicz Edinburgh North and Leith Labour/Co-operative
£165,171 (43rd)

23. Thomas McAvoy Rutherglen and Hamilton West Labour Party
£150,976 (254th)

24. John McFall West Dunbartonshire Labour/Co-operative
£161,121 (85th)

25. James McGovern Dundee West Labour Party
£171,989 (9th)

26. Anne McGuire Stirling Labour Party
£162,765 (69th)

27. Rosemary McKenna Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East Labour Party £167,113 (29th)

28. Ann McKechin Glasgow North Labour Party
£147,535 (313th)

29. Michael Martin Glasgow North East Labour Party – Speaker
£74,522 (642nd)* Yeah right!

30. Jim Murphy East Renfrewshire Labour Party
£162,542 (72nd)

31. Sandra Osborne Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock Labour Party
£128,701 (543rd)

32. Anne Picking aka Moffat the Bruiser East Lothian Labour Party
£168,255 (23rd)

33. John Reid Airdrie and Shotts Labour Party
£160,209 (98th)

34. John Robertson Glasgow North West Labour Party
£152,542 (229th)

35. Frank Roy Motherwell and Wishaw Labour Party
£158,637 (117th)

36. Lindsay Roy Glenrothes Labour Party
New boy hasn't learned the ropes yet.

37. Mohammad Sarwar Glasgow Central Labour Party
£174,882 (5th)

38. Jim Sheridan Paisley and Renfrewshire North Labour Party
£152,989 (217th)

39. Gavin Strang Edinburgh East Labour Party
£157,571 (131st)

Baron Blowhard. Student-Councillor-MP-Lord-MSP-Sponger.

The Baron has spent the last 24 hours harassing journalists in an attempt to deflect criticism away from the worst outbreak of trough swilling fever since time began. He's been on BBC News 24, Radio Scotland's Morning Extra, The Today Programme on Radio 4 and even poor old Jeremy Vine's Radio 2 show.

His modus operandi has been very simplistic, attack the interviewers when they pursue the question of rule bending trouser filling, ask how much they as public employees earn and then rubbish them as a waste of his taxes. His taxes? The tax he pays is taken from the pay WE give him. The man has spent a lifetime sucking at the public teat.

A look at his biography finds a trail leading from private school to University to councillor, MP, Lord and finally MSP and court jester.



He attended fee paying Haberdashers' Aske's Boys' School alongside such hard-line socialists as Leon Brittan, Simon Schama, Sir Nicholas Serota and Brian Sewell.



Through to Edinburgh University, where he skipped on to the gravy train, after graduation and became full time President of the Scottish Union of Students.



After his presidency of SUS, he became Rector’s Assessor to the Rector of Edinburgh University and then from 1975-79 as Assessor from the Lothian Regional Council on the University Court.

Thankfully he also managed to get himself elected as a councillor in Edinburgh local government in May 1970. He was Vice-Chairman of Education and Bailie (Magistrate) on Edinburgh City Council, on which he served from l970 to l975.

In 1974, the Baron was elected to Lothian Regional Council where he was Chair of the Education Committee of the Council, of COSLA and of the Scottish Teachers Salaries and Conditions of Service Committee.

Ironically, he was also on the boards of Fettes College, Heriot’s and the Merchant Company and, more appropriately, Napier, Telford and Sighthill Colleges. He was a member of the General Teaching Council (GTC) and Chair of the Scottish Adult Literacy Agency.

He stood, unsuccessfully, for Parliament in West Edinburgh in June 1970 and in Edinburgh Pentlands in October l974 and was finally elected in South Ayrshire on 3rd May l979, when he defeated sitting MP Jim Sillars who had left Labour to form the Scottish Labour Party.

Fast forward to the end of the Baron’s life as an MP and we find a very wealthy man.

In 2005, he sold one Edinburgh property and bought another in the capital for £305,000 without a mortgage. He sold his home in Ayrshire for £600,000 - a deal that made him a £400,000 profit - and bought a cottage in Maybole for £280,000, again without a loan.

Then we discover that over a two-year period he claimed £45,000 for renting a London flat that his own mother left him in her will. That he had lived in since 1980, when his mother bought it. Naturally during the period 1980 to 2005 he also claimed expenses on that flat.

I'll not go into his drunken assualt on an old lady in London or his alleged touching relationships with the demi monde of Calton Hill or Ayr seafront.



Suffice it to say that, when it comes to lectures on fucking the public purse, Baron George Von Foulkes has no equal.

SCOTTISH LABOUR POLITICIAN OF THE DECADE

After much consideration and heavy thought as to which Scottish Labour Politician has proved themselves the most capable, intelligent, adroit, fleet of foot and mind, a politician with an uncanny ability to look in the mirror and foretell the future. I have come to the conclusion that although there are many worthy contenders, all with their own special idiosyncrasies, the one man (sorry ladies) who has shown that he has the chameleon like qualities of a spectre, a shift shaper, a man with the ability to melt into the background and read the runes of public disquiet, I present you with none other than the former Labour MP for Glasgow East, Mr. David Marshall



Mr Marshall, sitting in one of the safest Labour seats, as we all know left the troughs of Westminster last year citing 'stress' as his illness.

Was it stress brought about by the gargantuan task of overturning the morass of poverty, ill health, unemployment, alcohol and drug dependency rates or did our latter day Nostrodamus, look into the runes and discover that the raping of the public purse could only last for a fleeting few moments more?

Farewell David Marshall, may you enjoy your MP pension and additional entitlements into a long lasting old age.

Trough swilling at its finest

Ordinarily, I wouldn't bother doing a straight copy 'n' paste, however on this occasion my hat is off to Telegraph for going through the expenses of the Speaker of the House of Commons and Labour MP for Springburn. Father of Paul Martin Labour MSP for.....yep you guessed it Glasgow Springburn. Nothing like a family dynasty of trough swillers. Paul of course received all the air miles his dear old dad accrued when on publicy paid flights. He didn't declare it on his allowances, but don't worry, nobody prosecuted him...



For those of you who missed it on The Telegraph, read on and curse your misfortune for not getting on the gravy train.

Michael Martin: Speaker spent £1,400 on chauffeurs to his local job centre and Celtic Park

Michael Martin spent more than £1,400 on a chauffeurs in his Glasgow constituency, including journeys to the local job centre and to Celtic Park, the home of Celtic football club.

The disclosures are embarrassing for Mr Martin who as Speaker of the Commons has been spending hundreds of thousands of pounds trying to stop the details of the expenses claims being published.

Mr Martin spent more than £1,400 with a Scottish chauffeur hire company in 2004-05. He used it on 12 occasions.

For each of its customers, the company provides a driver wearing a uniform of a grey suit and grey cap. Mr Martin chose to hire a standard saloon car, which the company said would have been either a Jaguar XF, Volvo S80 or a Mercedes E-Class vehicle.

The claims show that on July 23 2004 Mr Martin took a chauffeur-driven car to Springburn Job Centre. The charge for the eight-hour day was £173.90 for a 40-mile round-trip.

The visits during that year also included three journeys to social housing projects in the city.

They included a trip on September 10 2004 to North Glasgow Housing Association. Overall the 32-mile journey took three-and-half hours and cost £97.62.

On another occasion, Mr Martin took a car to John Smith House, the head office of the Labour Party in Glasgow. The driver waited outside, and eventually billed Mr Martin for £64.11.

Mr Martin was also driven by the company from his home, via Celtic Park – where the driver waited – and on to the Glasgow Hilton, at a cost of £100.53 on March 6 2004.

Receipts filed with the fees office show that the account with the company was organised by Mr Martin's office in the House of Commons.

Mr Martin's details also show that he claimed nearly £290 for a two-night stay in April 2006 at the Culloden Hall Estate and Spa, one of the finest 5-star hotels in Northern Ireland. The Culloden's website describes the hotel, on the wooded slopes of the Holywood Hills overlooking Belfast Lough as "built for a bishop... fit for a king".

Mr Martin's expenses claims as the MP for Glasgow North East also show he claimed for the near-full food allowance on his second home during the summer holidays.

In one year – 2007-08 – he charged £2,200 for his food, including £1,050 in July, August and September 2007, when for the most part MPs are not meant to be claiming on their second home.

The Speaker also charged new "Aristocrat" carpets to the taxpayer, costing £1,834, at his constituency home in Glasgow as well as another £1,490 on the cost of redecorating a room.

Mr Martin left the taxpayer with a Rentokil bill for nearly £3,000 and charged for a £285 rug, the claims show. He also claimed £200 for employing someone to tidy his garden and £205 for gutter cleaning.

A spokesman for Mr Martin said: "There are certain circumstances that require Mr Martin to be driven.

He does not use government cars which would be more expensive for the infrequency of these occasions."

She said the fees office "permits the use of taxis for travel within the constituency on parliamentary business".

She said the new carpet was permitted by Commons' authorities. The stay in the hotel had been approved under Commons rules.

Profile: Michael Martin

Job: Speaker of the House of Commons

Salary: £138,724

Total second home claims

2004-05: £6,106

2005-06: £9,551

2006-07: £17,346

2007-08: £11,750

Scottish television from Newcastle!

Soooooo, here's a story. This week we've seen Party Political Broadcasts (PPB's) from all the major parties.

BBC Scotland have shown us Brown holding hands with Obama, whom I presume is standing in the forthcoming Euro elections. Murphy and Iain Gray got a mention, as did lots of snide comments about divorce and seperation.



However, here in the land of the Doonhamer a quick glance at this weeks TV schedule showed a strange anomaly. Border TV who no longer operate from Carlisle and have been subsumed within Tyne Tees to make Tyne Tees and Border ITV, made a boo boo. Based over in Newcastle they supposedly serve the circa 250,000 grumbling jocks in the Dumfries & Galloway and the Scottish Border regions, giving us a few moments of opt out TV as a sop to the OFCOM considerations, that they purportedly represent their viewers with local news and issues.




Therefore it was with some disquiet this week that I discovered that Border had decided not to show the SNP Party PPB and instead planned on showing the UKIP one. By doing so they disenfranchise a a sizeable number of SNP members, voters and future voters of seeing their countries democratically elected governments views on the life politic.



Vociferous emails were sent and sense finally prevailed. All well and good, but what is the point in having a regional TV company, part of the mahoosive ITV franchise that gives a few moments opt out reportage to a sizeable number of people in another country. Put it this way, the distance between Stranraer and Newcastle is similar to the distance between Stranraer and Dundee.

It's time for a distinct Scottish Digital broadcasting channel which can serve all the people of Scotland.

Paul McBride - QC I put it to you Sir, is still the biggest liar in the Scottish Legal System

http://www.sundaymail.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2009/05/03/exclusive-legal-aid-chief-arrested-with-rent-boy-in-shopping-centre-toilet-78057-21328394/


Sooooooo, the head of legal services at the Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) is caught by police getting interior design tips from a convicted rent boy inside a toilet cubicle built for one and Paul McBride QC thunders that there is not enough evidence to convict.

Without being too graphic, the Legal Aid chappy was discovered by the Glasgow polis on his hunkers on a toilet floor presumably looking at the fine examples of art decor on the St Enoch centre bog tiles, whilst his young companion, in an excitable state of undress was gripped with the moment and explaining about how the colour of his home soft furnishing matched that of his boxer shorts. The polis and security guards obviously mistook the proximity of the two chappies in the loo for a passionate tryst, best kept for behind chintz curtains and not particularly best suited in a public place, and subsequently huckled them.

Naturally the policemen and Security guards who gave their time to make witness statements and the rather hard pressed procurator fiscal who deemed there was a case to answer, must have been a tad nonplussed when McBride with his keen analytical mind trumped their eyewitness reports with the astounding revelation that there was "not enough evidence to convict!"

The young scallywag who it is further alleged, was helping to clear a phlegm blockage in Mr Heggarty's windpipe with his priapic member was of course being defended by a run of the mill legal aid funded solicitor. Mr Heggarty was defended by McBride, the chap who Cathy Jamieson appointed to the legal Aid Board in 2007 for a four year term the remuneration for this hard job is a mere £8,328 for about three and a half days’ work a month. In 2006-7 McBride took £379,000 in legal aid fees.

Nice to see that the legal world in Scotland has its priorities right. When one of it's number is caught up in a scandal, be it for smuggling drugs up your snatch into prison, drunk driving, serious assault, attempted murder, inciting religious intolerance by singing songs of bigotry or merely paying a young man for sex in a public toilet, they will always defend their own and deem the charge to have insufficient evidence for conviction...Ach well I suppose Mr Haggarty can frame his written warning and put it on his office wall when he returns to publicly funded work, he's only been off on a sicky since he was caught in this delicate situation in January.

HAPPY 2ND BIRTHDAY SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT

How many governments reach their midterm as a minority government only to find they're more popular than when they started out?

Answers on a fat Geordie Unionist's forehead in BiC pen...

Nationalists Sieze Control

Once normality is restored and Scotland is once again an independent country, able to do its own thing, there should be plenty of work for historians to look back at the dying days of Unionism and the use of language in its propaganda.

After reading of more laden bias from the pages of the Hootsman on the Spooksters blog

http://advancedmediawatch.blogspot.com/2009/05/more-censorship-and-biased-reporting.html

I thought I'd go an see if there were any results from the Bannockburn cooncil byelection, A quick search and I discovered the beeb report, no results yet, just that it was taking place.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/tayside_and_central/8026700.stm

I read the article, and was drawn to the last paragraph which contained the following:

"The Nationalists seized control of the local authority in March last year following a vote of no confidence in the ruling Labour group."




Now the use of 'nationalists seized control' sounded familiar to the reporting of the SNP assuming control of Dundee City Council in March when the 70 something Labour Lord Provost decided it was unfair that the largest party on the council had no chairs of any of the council committees and voted with the SNP. Nationalists seize control was the appelation de jour then.

Another search finds this term is most often used historically, during armed uprising, with lives lost on both sides of a struggle. More often than not it is used in the context of 'evil' right wing groups usurping the popular mandate of a democratically elected government, other cases apply to the fall of Ceaucescu in Romania etcetera.

When there is democratic change and Labour become the party in power this is more commonly referred to as "Labour take control" or "Labour win".

Odd isn't it? As I say, a lot of truth and reconciliation once the smooth transition takes place.

15,000 new Mac jobs and the right to have the Saltire on our registration plates. Hold me back

Jimbob Murphy the venerable Secretary for the state of Scotland hits the news today, in the super Soaraway Scoddish Sun.

He's grabbed the front page declaring jobs for all, only possible through the divine working of a Labour government. A closer analysis reveals much of what he claims is a rehash of the old YOP schemes of 30 years ago, when my generation were wiped out of the jobs market.

So rather than receive dole money, if you're between 18 and 24 it's off to Tescos to train how to stack shelves from 10am to 8pm then in six months time, if you're really lucky...you might be kept on, although chances are a fresh 18 year old will be taking your training place.



The other big news, which I seem to recall was an SNP campaign about ten years ago is that Scoddish motorists are finally to be allowed place a saltire on their registration plate and not face penal servitude for identifying with Scotland. In fact I seem to remember Helen Liddle of Airdrie and Adelaide, the then secretary for the state of Scotland actually backed the SNP campaign. It's only taken them ten years to implement it....



Speaking to DVLA Direct, Murphy said: “The Saltire is a proud symbol of Scotland which belongs to every Scottish driver, so it’s right that Scottish drivers here should be allowed to display it on their licence plates, not just separatist drunken drivers of baby raping, planet killing nationalist vehicles.

Independence Referendum "There to be Won"

POLL SHOWS INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM “THERE TO BE WON”

SUPPORT MOVES AHEAD IN EUROPEAN CONTEXT

New findings of a YouGov poll show that support for Scottish independence moves ahead when the question is put in the context of Scotland being “a member of the European Union in its own right”. In total, 42 per cent back that position, compared to 40 per cent against.

The poll also shows that 35 per cent of Scots are more likely to back Scottish independence if the Tories were to win the next General Election, compared to just 6 per cent who would be less likely – a balance of some six-to-one.

In the independence referendum poll question, support for independence increases by 4 points from the last YouGov poll in March to 37%, with 52% against – the best position in a YouGov poll since September 2008.

SNP Westminster leader Angus Robertson said:

“This poll shows that an independence referendum is there to be won. As we approach the European elections, when people are asked if they want Scotland to be a member of the EU in our own right – as opposed to being represented by the UK government – the answer is positive. And the headline support for independence has also increased by 4 points to the best position in a YouGov poll since last autumn.

“As the UK government arbitrarily axes the Scottish budget by £500 million in the teeth of a recession, it will become ever clearer why Scotland needs to be in charge of our own resources – and with our own voice to protect and promote Scottish interests in Europe.”

SNP President and MEP Ian Hudghton said;

“This poll is an excellent starting point for the SNP as we go into the European election campaign.

“This poll shows voters want Scotland to have a strong independent voice in Europe. A vote for the SNP in June is about giving Scotland that voice, supporting the SNP in fighting for Scottish jobs in Europe and showing that Scotland has what it takes to be at the heart of Europe.”

ENDS

Details of the poll are as follows:

On balance do you think Scotland should…?

Continue to be represented by the UK Government in the European Union - 40%
Be a member of the European Union in its own right and represented by the Scottish Government - 42%
Neither of these - 9%
Don’t know - 9%

In the referendum, the Scottish Government intends to ask people whether they think the Scottish Government should negotiate a new partnership with the United Kingdom so that Scotland becomes an independent country.

Do you agree or disagree that the Scottish Government should negotiate this new partnership?

I AGREE that the Scottish Government should negotiate a new partnership so that Scotland becomes an independent country - 37%
I DO NOT AGREE that the Scottish Government should negotiate a new partnership so that Scotland becomes an independent country - 52%
Don’t know - 11%

Note - In a YouGov poll in January the gap was 26% and in a March YouGov poll it was 20%.

If the Conservative Party were to win the next General Election, would this make you more likely or less likely to back Scottish independence?

Much more likely to back Scottish independence - 24%
Slightly more likely - 11%
Slightly less likely - 3%
Much less likely to back Scottish independence - 3%
No difference – I would back Scottish independence anyway - 14%
No difference – I would NOT back Scottish independence anyway - 34%
Don’t know - 11%

The YouGov poll was commissioned by the SNP and conducted from 21-22 April among 1,020 Scottish adults.

Who's got what it takes?

WE'VE GOT WHAT IT TAKES - POLL CONFIRMS VOTER’S
TRUST IN SNP

NECK & NECK RACE FOR WESTMINSTER

GRAY’S RATINGS WORSE THAN WENDY’S

A new poll by YouGov – and commissioned by the
SNP – has confirmed the voters trust in the SNP
Government is increasing for all elections as
we approach the second anniversary of the SNP’s
historic victory in the 2007 Scottish
Parliamentary elections.

The poll of 1020 people on 21 and 22nd April
2009 shows:

* The SNP increasing its vote in the constituency
and regional votes for the Scottish Parliament

* The SNP vote for Westminster elections increasing
by 12%, bringing the party neck and neck with Labour

* Twice as many people trust the SNP Scottish
Government to focus on their needs and interests as
trust the UK Labour Government

* Alex Salmond’s ratings dwarfing other party leaders
with Iain Gray’s ratings figures not only lower than
Annabel Goldie’s but historically lower than any other
Scottish Labour leader.

* Voters of all parties see the SNP holding the balance
of power in Westminster as a "good thing" for Scotland

Commenting on the poll figures Angus Robertson MP,
SNP Business Convenor and Westminster leader, said:

“This is a sensational poll for the SNP and for Scotland.
As we approach the mid term of the Parliament, they are
the SNP's strongest ratings since last autumn.

“The poll shows that voters across Scotland know that we
have what it takes to focus on their needs and interests
during tough times.

“As the SNP approaches the second anniversary of our
historic election victory, the poll demonstrates a tale
of two governments.

“The SNP’s actions in our first two years in Government
have delivered major improvements in people's lives,
with the council tax frozen, scrapping of small business
rates, the phased abolition of prescription charges, and
investment in jobs and skills under our six-point plan to
support Scotland through the recession.

"By contrast, Labour's £500 million raid on Scottish spending
has set the terms of politics in Scotland, and will galvanise
SNP support further in the European and Westminster elections
to come.

"Labour have let people down with their mismanagement of
the economy and attacks of Scotland's public services.

“Double the number of people trust the SNP Government
over the UK Labour government to be on their side.
The SNP’s support for jobs, skills, training and investment
is clearly recognised by voters as doing everything possible
within our powers to promote recovery from Labour’s
recession and build a strong, sustainable economy and society.”

Commenting on the leadership and First Minister ratings which
confirm Alex Salmond’s support and show the Labour leader with
the worst figures ever,

Mr Robertson said:

“This result shows that people believe Alex Salmond is an
excellent First Minister for all of Scotland - he is more
popular among Labour voters than Iain Gray, and more popular
among Lib Dem voters that Tavish Scott!

“The poll is a personal disaster for Iain Gray – as
Labour’s Scottish leader he is the invisible man, and
totally overshadowed by Jim Murphy and Steven Purcell.

“No Labour leader has ever had such low support from
the Scottish public. When even fewer people want to see
Iain Gray as First Minister than wanted Wendy Alexander,
this is a crisis for his leadership."

Commenting on the voting intentions for Westminster and
the support for the SNP to hold the balance of power at
Westminster Stewart Hosie MP, Convenor of the SNP’s
Westminster Campaign added;

“These dramatic results show voters know the SNP has got
what it takes to provide them with a strong voice at Westminster.

“Labour have lost the trust of the Scottish public.

“With a 12% increase from the 2005 election the SNP is
winning the trust of the Scottish electorate at all levels
whilst Labour is continuing to lose public support and the
LibDems are disappearing from the electoral map.

“There is clear evidence from this poll that voters of
all parties support the SNP holding the balance of power
at Westminster, no matter who is in number 10.

“The SNP in Westminster have got what it takes to see
Scotland’s interests protected, not sacrificed as they
have been under successive Labour and Tory governments and
this poll shows that the Scottish public recognise
our vital role in protecting and promoting their interests."

ENDS

Notes:

Poll details are as follows:

Holyrood Constituency Vote

Party - Poll (Change from last poll) -
[Change from 2007 election]

SNP - 37% (+2%) [+4%]
Labour - 30% (-4%) [-2%]
Tory - 15% (1%) [-2%]
LibDem - 13% (1%) [-3%]
Other - 5% (1%) [3%]

Holyrood Regional Vote

Party - Poll (Change from last poll) -
[Change from 2007 election]

SNP - 37% (+7%) - [+6%]
Labour - 28% (-4%) - [-1%]
Tory - 15% (0%) - [1%]
LibDem - 13% (2%) - [2%]
Other - 7% (-5%) - [-8%]

Westminster voting intentions:

SNP - 30%
Lab - 32%
Tory - 21%
LibDem - 13%
Other - 5%

* Which ONE, if any, of the following Scottish
Political leaders do you think would make the best
First Minister?

Alex Salmond - 36%
Annabelle Goldie - 10%
Iain Gray - 7%
Tavish Scott - 4%
Patrick Harvie - 1%

7% for Iain Gray is the worst figure recorded for a
Labour leader in Scotland since the 2007 election and
probably since polling began.

Wendy Alexander's lowest rating was 9%.

Previous polls on party leader ratings had the following
ratings for Labour leaders:

Apr-09 - 7% - Iain Gray
Mar-09 - 17% - Iain Gray
Jan-09 - 15% - Iain Gray
Oct-08 - 13% - Iain Gray
Sep-08 - 15% - Combined Labour*
Apr-08 - 11% - Wendy Alexander
Nov-07 - 10% - Wendy Alexander
Oct-07 - 9% - Wendy Alexander

* Figures were Iain Gray 3%, Cathy Jamieson 7%,
and Andy Kerr 5%.


* Thinking about the performance of the UK Labour
Government and the Scottish SNP Government over
the past year…

- Which do you think cares MOST about the needs and
interests of you and your family?

Scottish Government - 44%
UK Government - 22%
Neither - 26%
Don’t know - 7%

- On balance, do you think the Labour Party will win
or lose the next UK General Election?

Win - 23%
Lose - 61%
Don’t know - 17%

* It is possible that at the next British general election,
neither the Labour or Conservative Party will win an outright
majority and that other parties, including the Scottish National
Party, could hold the balance of power.

- Do you think this is…?

A good thing for Scotland - 41%
A bad thing for Scotland - 19%
Makes no difference either way - 28%
Don’t know - 13%

Have we got what it takes?

Think so. Showaddywaddy does too.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkIC629sos0

We've got what it takes.

Posted this on the Hootsman today and was fair flummoxed that it was removed by the Administrator. I reposted it thanks to the previous button and asked why.

Then it dawned on me has anyone ever had an explanation for the Hootsman's bullying censorship?



Finally – Brown says sorry for smeargate

"Finally". I'm loving the use of this term in the headline, it implies that the Hootsman have been indulging in the wailing and gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair in an attempt to make Prudence say sorry for the filth that operates in his front office and cabinet.

I've eschewed all this talk of 'traitors' from some of my independence loving chums, putting it down to some 18th century Walter Scott romanticised view of morals versus citizenship. Now after watching Broon's attack dogs slebber all over Scotland yesterday, particularly the toadying, loathsome creep that is Jim Murphy, I can see the fascination and application of the word is quite applicable.

Michty! Scottish Labour Sex Scandal Surely Not...

Scottish Labour politician in Shrek like tryst, naw, say it ain't so...




Sunday Hootsman should be busy...

SCOTTISH LABOUR PURE HATE TOURISTS SO THEY DO.

So, in circumstances I'd rather not go into, I recently found myself reading the Daily Retard. Having long given up any thoughts on finding actual news, I was most perplexed to discover yet another jibe by Labour at Homecoming 2009.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2009/04/15/sean-connery-homecoming-advert-cost-more-than-slumdog-millionaire-claim-86908-21279498/


This time Labour tourism spokesman Lewis Macdonald, (you'll recognise him below, he's the one that permanently looks as if he's curling off a skittery three pounder) declared that the Homecoming advert cost more per minute than Oscar winning movie Slumdog Millionaire.


Speaking like a man with shares in Imodium, Mr McDonald claimed the advert cost £233,450 for its 59 seconds, versus Slumdog which cost £28,000 per minute. So far so curious. Thankfully an anonymous Telly insider was able to provide Magnus Gardham, the Retard's political editor, with some shocking FACTS!

He/she said: "The ad could have been made for £2000."

"It would have looked big budget if they'd spent £20,000."

Jings, I thought, 'a sixty second advert of wondrous quality, with an excellent song, jam packed with Scoddish slebs for £2,000, what colour is the sky in this "insiders" world?

Now having been involved in the 'glamorous' world of telly production for a wheen of years, I pondered, at the costs, thankfully the article explained that the rights to the song cost £15,000. For a whole year, pretty darn good. I once enquired about using a 30 second burst of Charles Trenet's 'La Mer' a TV project and was quoted a price of £7,000 for 10 seconds...and that was nearly 20 years ago...However, I digress...I then happened upon BBC Scotland, lapping up this mince like a cake hungry chum slut. Using the rather ambiguous headline,

SNP ad 'cost more than Slumdog'

'Mmm', thought I, an 'SNP ad'. What like a Party Political broadcast? Then like Douglas Fraser's last expenses claim to The Herald, the actual cost rose to a ginormous £559,287

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7999044.stm

Ah but that includes the marketing, promotion and rather importantly the transmission costs in various foreign markets. They then inform us that Mr McDonald was actually wrong that Slumdog in reality cost £10 million pounds rather than the £3million he bandied about like free toilet paper.

This is where my previous experience in production costs come in handy. Low budget films that you have seen in the cinema did not cost the pennies the producers tell you they did, that is part of the marketing mince they want you to buy into.

Reservoir Dogs, Desperado, Do the Right Thing, all done on deferred payments and credit cards. B-O-L-L-O-C-K-S. Each one of these films and Slumdog were party to massive investments in marketing. Slumdog Millionaire was distributed in the US by Fox Searchlight, when they put out a film on US general release in 1000's of screens they spend an average of $30 million dollars on promotion and marketingper fillum...and then when it got the Oscar nod, well double that figure. Every dollar spent getting the Oscar, accrues another 10 dollars on DVD sales and merchandising...

Grrr so for Labour to compare the costs for an advert that is designed to encourage tourists to visit and spend money in Scotland (that includes the parts that are still Labour afflicted) you can surmise that my blood is fairly well close to boiling.

Labour you expect this mince from, but for BBC Scotland to claim Homecoming is an 'SNP ad' and then double the price is just downright insidious. Whichever Labour lackey decided this is the path to impartial reporting needs taken out and given a right good shoeing.