Sunday, 14 November 2010

It won't go away...

Whilst BBC Scotland and STV were behaving like proud toddlers displaying a freshly laid turd in their little hand, with their exemplar coverage of Scottish prisoners getting flat screen tellies and Anne McLaughlin tweeting that listening to Labour MSP's in committee would go down better with a dose of anti-depressives, a real story was taking place, this past week, in of all places our pretendy wee Parliament in Holyrood.

Media coverage of the 'Justice for Megrahi' campaign group appearance was displayed in all its cringe laden paucity. Thankfully those legal beagle coves at The Scottish Law blogspot have done a fantastic job of providing tip top coverage of it, including video of the committee sitting and testimony from Prof Robert Black, Dr Jim Swire et al. If you're interested to read, see or hear the evidence that was dismissed by our three noble Scottish judges, then these clips behove you to listen to what wronged a man to universal vilification.



As  Professor Black told the committee, 'the conviction rests on the premise that Mr Al-Megrahi was the man who bought the clothes from the shop Mary’s House in Sliema, and which were later said to have been wrapped around the suitcase bomb which destroyed the Boeing 747'. According to this theory, consistently rejected by amongst others the Maltese government and Air Malta, the bomb left from Malta and was transferred onto the Pan Am Flight in Germany.

Professor Black continued,'Tony Gauci, the Maltese star witness for the prosecution, had only ever said that Mr Al-Megrahi looked “a lot like the man” who bought the clothes from his shop in the days before the bombing.'

“He also said in his first police statement that the man was more than six feet tall and over 50 years old. At the relevant time in 1988, Mr Al-Megrahi was 38. He was then, and remains now I presume, five foot, eight inches tall. Still, the court held that he had been positively identified,” 

It's rather ironic that today, 14th of November, is the 19th anniversary of the day that Megrahi and Fhima were accused of being the bombers. It's an ugly anniversary coming a mere six weeks before the 22nd anniversary of the plane blowing up over Lockerbie. 

The near three years of investigation, when huge amounts of pressure were put on eensy weensy Dumfries and Galloway Constabulary to come up with suspects and the Scottish Judiciary to firm up a conviction have to be reexamined. The Scottish Government were not in existance at the time, let alone in power. This investigation took place during the dying days of the Thatcher government. A government more noted for sleaze, corruption, dodgy arms deals than honesty.  


The Scottish government have three important questions to answer:
  
  • Will you open an independent inquiry into the 2001 Kamp van Zeist conviction of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi for the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 in December 1988 as called for by the petitioner and for the reasons given in the petition?
  • If not, will you provide a detailed explanation why not, specifying whether there is any legislation which would prevent you from holding such an inquiry, what this legislation is and how it prevents?
 
  • Who would have the power to undertake an inquiry in the terms proposed in the petition? 
 
 
 It's time...



 






.


5 comments:

Nikostratos said...

Kenny said

My decisions were predicated on the fact that he was properly investigated, a lawful conviction passed and a life sentence imposed.


http://www.scotland.gov.uk/News/This-Week/Speeches/Safer-and-stronger/lockerbie-statement

Time to close that auld book

Administrator said...

Well, in my auld book, he's wrong. Look at the people still employed in the Justice department who happen to have been there since Lockerbie...

Observer said...

I am utterly convinced that Megrahi is a patsy & that the Lockerbie bombing was carried out by agents acting on behalf of Iran via Syria in retaliation for the American shooting down of an Iranian passenger jet Iran Air Flight 655.

I think there is more than enough evidence in existence, not least the six points identified in the SCCRC report on the matter to justify an inquiry.

However I think it is utterly impractical & naive to imagine that an SNP minority government could order one.

It would need the will of the whole Parliament, & the last action they took was to vote to condemn the very release of Megrahi, so what are the odds that they would vote for an inquiry into his conviction?

And it would need a vote.

Administrator said...

Agreed Observer, although a free vote would be symbolic and perhaps allow the big boys in the EU or UN to get involved. The Maltese are desperate to clear their name and association...

Billy Carlin said...

Having spoken to an-ex Detective Constable who was at Lockerbie, and who lives round the corner from me, who confirmed that there were millions of needles around the place and that they had to "shovel" up the bodies makes me think that the planes was illegally carrying munitions thta went off destroying the plane. Off course that is something if true both the US and UK governments would want to keep covered up. Link to the Firm magazine post regarding the needles etc on a recent post over at mine although I still have an open mind regarding the possibility of the Iran-Syria terrorist link mentioned by Observer - It was certainly nothing to do with Megrahi or the Lybians.

Smell the cheese.

Smell the cheese.
Former vile blogger Montague Burton aka Mark MacLachlan

The equally bored.

Lend With Care

Lendwithcare.org microloans from CARE International - Banner Ad

Colour me chuffed.

Colour me chuffed.
Thanks to everyone who made up their own mind.

Children in tweed.

Children in tweed.
14th place. Thanks again to everyone with a pulse and a brain.

BIG BLOG ARCHIVE...click on links below for OLDER POSTS

The Good, the bad and the Unionist