I was a wee bitty concerned when Stewart asked me to write a piece for Caledonian Mercury about my thoughts on what the other parties' weaknesses are vis-a-vis the SNP. A dull thud in the back of my head pounded out the question, why me? Paranoia kicked in. Was I leaving myself open for a kicking from the plethora of dribbling sockpuppets that infest the Scotsman comments undergrowth and who occasionally slither over to the Cal Merc board? Probably. Would it bother me? Yawn. Was I expected to put the boot into the Tartan Overlord after he joined Labour in devoting an entire FMQ to little old me and my wayward keyboard ways? Nope, I’ve had loads of opportunities to do so in the Cheesy blog and haven’t felt the need to bellow half-naked from the rooftops, yet. Would I take the opportunity to do a Crichton/McKenna like fluff job on the SNP leader. As if.
So dear reader, in order to avoid a spiral of paranoid stupidity, I decided to ruminate on where Scotland is today and why we should all be fearful of mediocrity.
The vintage age of fifty is approaching me like a joyriders stolen Suburu hurtles towards a bumbling blue bottles backside. There’s no way to avoid the impending thud of this date, so like the leisurely feller I am, I tend to find myself taking a dawdle down memory lane, wearing comfortable brogues and idly twirling my moustache, where like a chap who had a good war, I wallow in the fading glow of nostalgia.
I belong to that generation of Python heads who at the merest mention of the word ‘blessed’ can rattle off the sermon on the mound scene from the ‘Life of Brian’. I spent the early eighties living in the schizophrenic environs of west end Glasgow. On one hand, it was the enlightened city that saw culture as a great regenerating force that created Mayfest and brought Peter Brooks Mahabarata to a freezing cold tram depot. On t’other the venerable city fathers embraced their dark fearful side and prohibited screenings of the above mentioned film, lest wit and sacrilegious thought infested the city youths. Like North Africans and Arabs have taken to Twitter and Facebook to express themselves, early eighties Pythonians would furtively gather in basement flats of an unemployable afternoon and engage in the nefarious act of listening to and reciting the long player soundtrack of the film. I still have the somewhat faded vinyl album, complete with closing hymn, which all these years on reminds me of our venerable opposition in Scotland. ‘All Things Dull and Ugly.’
The one sketch that resonates to this day is, “What Have the Romans Ever Done For Us?” The debate between the Peoples Front of Judea as they discuss life in Judea before the arrival of the Romans. It’s a bit like watching the weekly ordeal of FMQ. The opposition parties are convinced that the SNP government have done nothing for them and their constituents these past four years. Until a wee voice at the back of the mind of the most impartial viewer pops up and says. ‘The aqueduct’?
So apart from the Aqueduct what have the SNP ever done for us?
How about these for starters?
·
Delivered an extra 1,000 police officers
· Crime in Scotland has fallen to 32-year low
· Scottish Knife Crime at a 10 Year Low
· Gun crimes falling to a 10-year low
· Keeping open local accident and emergency units as promised
· Prescription charges cut dramatically and about to be abolished
· Removed the tolls on all of Scotland's roads and bridges
· A record number of modern apprenticeships
· Reversed a decade of decline in international educational comparisons
· Increased payments for free personal and nursing care
· Helped 70,000 small businesses with the small business bonus
· Oh and of course frozen the council tax for the last four years.
I could quite easily fill the page with other achievements both small and large that make a difference in every day Scotland, but that’s not my job.
The opposition parties in their effort to contain the fiendishly successful machinations of the Scottish government have gone out of their way to put party before country. Legislation for the betterment of all has been brought to a shuddering halt by the spending power of the vested interests. Those same parties who swear to their dying breath a desire to save small Scottish business, now nestle comfortably in the comfy pockets of the supermarket billionaires.
Therefore I’m more interested in, ‘What the SNP could have done for us, but were stopped from doing.’
The opposition parties block vote against the introduction of a minimum unit price for alcohol, has potentially cost Scotland’s health and wealth a fortune.
There is as we all recognize a booze culture in Scotland where our youngsters indulge in necking the cheap supermarket stuff at home before going out clubbing or pubbing, thus avoiding the high prices often found at said establishments.
Having imbibed to beyond sufficiency, they then indulge in post entertainment ribaldry and japes which more than often involves vandalism, pissing in shop doorways and vomiting in no-longer-working public fountains. Attempts at back alley amour usually end up with further exchanges of bodily fluids, just not the intended ones. This usually results in raised emotions, tempers are frayed and some poor blighter's son or daughter ends up with a smashed bottle being ground into their previously unblemished faces.
The 'harder' type will of course endeavour to display his weaponry skills and often sever a companion’s major artery resulting in massive loss of blood. The resulting costs in police, ambulance, nurse, doctor, mortuary, undertaker and social worker services are of course perfectly acceptable when balanced against the 'do-gooders' attempt to curb excessive alcohol consumption.
Here's a stat for you, in dearest Dumfropolis 92 % of all ambulance calls on Friday evening, Saturday evening and Sunday morning are booze related. So if your child turns blue and stops breathing in their cot on a Friday night or your husband clutches his left arm, turns puce and plants his face in the G-plan glass coffee table, chances are your ambulance crew are going to be a bit late getting too him or her, because they're currently trying to peel a shit, piss and puke encrusted half-dressed teenager off a precinct floor, whilst their mates wail, moan or jeer along.
Naturally, those lovable rapscallions are only expressing their right to go out on the lash and anyone from 'big brother' or the preferred 'nanny state' government that tells them they can't do that, can like go forth and procreate, right. However, the facts exist that money spent on mopping up the mess caused by cheap booze means there is less money to go round on things like nurses, doctors, specialists, ambulances, hospitals, GP's etcetera. But hey, don't let that bother you. Labour, the Lib Dems and the Tories, those supine friends of the supermarket lobby voted against legislation that allows our kids to go right on swallowing that Carlsberg special brew, White lightning and delightful tonic wine Buckfast until their little livers pack in.
The reality is there hasn’t been an effective opposition in Holyrood. The Greens have grown from being the curly haired scamps that everyone had a fondness for, into belligerent teens that’ll huff and puff and throw a hissy fit until every house in the land has loft insulation made from kitten fur. Spurned at Budget time, they now coyly bat their eyelids in the direction of Labour. The co-joined twins of the Tories and Lib Dems are fused at the hip in Westminster, similarly so in Holyrood. You’ll rarely hear a Tory slam a Lib Dem or vice versa. Prior to last year’s Westminster election they reserved their bile equally for the SNP and Labour.
No, the real opposition in Scotland relies on the concerted efforts of the Labour group of MSPs and their friends both North and South of the border in state broadcasting and their pro-Union mouthpiece chums in the dying tree press.
Here SNP achievements are twisted, distorted, partially reported or taken out of context. Hypocrisy and deceit have become central to the very being of the Labour party in Scotland. The SNP are talking about revolution, the Lib Dems, Tories & Greens devolution, whilst Labour still ponders over the benefits of evolution.
Civic Scotland has become infested with Labour placeman. There’s barely a council in the land where members of the senior management aren’t either married, related or in a relationship with members of the Labour party. This isn’t the party that looks after their voter’s -- they simply look after their own. Much like we require applicants who plan to work with children and vulnerable adults to undergo a Disclosure Scotland check maybe it’s time to apply something similar to the various HR departments across the public paid estate, where placemen become agent provocateurs…
Yet despite this, the Tartan Overlord and crew continue in their cheery positive way, ignoring the negative, not wallowing in the politics of character assassination. This does not always endear them to their supporters, who sometimes want to see some backbone, a flash of teeth and a bit of forcing the lies and the hypocrisy back into the lying liars mouths…But, if truth be told, the Salmond mantra of positivity is working. He’s got it right. His example puts the old adage about politicians of ‘they’re all the same’ into a fresh perspective.
At the last election the SNP were elected for a number of reasons, malaise with the bright shiny right wing party that Tony Blair had created, a deeply unpopular war predicated on lies, but above all else the SNP benefitted from Labours failure to improve the significant problems our country faced, does its election campaign today suggest that they have the policies to do so now? It’s as if time has stood still and they’ve settled into a default setting of carping and girning like a petulant child. Labour’s London handlers must be looking askance at the collapse of Fianna Fail across the Irish Sea and fearing the worst.
Today, it looks as if people in Scotland have woken up to the fact that the past four years of relentless negativity from the Labour party has shown that they have not matured as a socially progressive party, their failure to cast aside tribalism to vote for the common good, declares them to be as extinct as a parrot what has joined the choir invisible.
Oh and there's this.....
and the rest from http://www2.snp.org/
We have frozen Council Tax for four years, saving an average family more than £300.
We’ve slashed or abolished business rates for some 80,000 small firms and local employers, protecting jobs in tough times.
We’ve put 1,000 more police on Scotland’s streets, helping drive crime down to its lowest level for 32 years.
We’ve abolished prescription charges, saving people with long-term illnesses an average of more than £180.
The National Conversation launched in 2007 revived progress on the constitutional debate in Scotland, and paves the way for an independence referendum in the next parliament.
We’ve restored free higher education by ruling out upfront fees and abolishing the £2,300 graduate endowment - a back door tuition fee.
We’re delivering a record-breaking 25,000 modern apprenticeships in the year ahead – a two-thirds increase on 2007.
We’ve transformed Scotland into a world leader in green energy, consenting a record 39 new renewable projects since we came to office – more than double the previous administration.
Our £10 million Saltire Prize for marine energy innovation is establishing Scotland at the forefront of this global renewable technology.
We’ve removed tolls on the Forth and Tay Bridges, saving commuters £184 a year on crossing the Tay, and £207 a year on crossing the Forth.
We’ve kept healthcare local. That means A&E units have been saved, children’s cancer services and neurosurgery units protected, and maternity units kept open.
We have provided vital support for the staging of two of the world’s greatest sporting events here in Scotland in 2014 – the Commonwealth games in Glasgow and the Ryder Cup at Gleneagles. This includes the building of a new National Indoor Sports Arena and the Sir Chris Hoy Velodrome.
We’ve started 24,000 social sector homes since coming into office in 2007 – that’s an average of 115 new houses every week.
We’ve helped some of the world’s poorest people by doubling the international development budget and protecting that aid from UK cuts.
We’ve delivered smaller government, including fewer ministers and departments, saving more than £4 million over the parliamentary term.
We’ve provided funding to secure the Dundee V&A museum, the new Bannockburn visitor centre, and the creation of the Robert Burns Birthplace Museum in Ayrshire.
We’ve provided extra funding for Scotland’s veteran charities, and ensured our ex-service men and women receive priority treatment in the NHS and other services.
We’ve established Creative Scotland as a single, national body for the arts, culture and creative industries.
We’ve protected spending in the NHS with an extra £1.2 billion to health boards over the last four years to safeguard frontline services – and we will continue to protect the health budget.
We’ve abolished hidden waiting lists, and reduced hospital waiting lists to a record low.
We’ve increased the number of nurses, doctors and dentists working in the NHS – and we are reducing the number of senior managers by a quarter.
There are 1,000 more cleaners in the health service, helping ensure infection in Scottish hospitals is now at an all-time low.
We’ve set up a tough new inspectorate to ensure that our hospitals are clean.
We’ve banned irresponsible alcohol discounts in supermarkets and off licences.
We’ve made sure our older generation is properly cared for by increasing payments for free personal and nursing care for the first time since it was introduced.
We’ve delivered on our ambitious cancer target which means treatment begins within one month of a decision to treat.
We are building the £840 million new South Glasgow Hospital.
We’ve cut the risk from cervical cancer for the next generation of young women by providing the HPV vaccine for girls in S2.
One million more Scots are registered with NHS dentists under the SNP Government.
We’ve delivered a new dental school in Aberdeen.
We’ve frozen bonuses to NHS consultants.
We’ve made sure more GP practices are open in the evenings and at weekends.
We’ve abolished charges at all NHS-run hospital car parks.
We’ve introduced a Patient Rights Act to provide new statutory rights for all those using the health service.
We’ve given the public a direct say in the NHS by introducing pilot elections in two health boards.
We’re working for a healthier Scotland by raising the legal age for buying tobacco to 18.
We’ve delivered more than 40,000 new heating systems and helped Scots on low incomes to reduce energy costs and keep their homes warm.
We’ve enabled councils to build new homes for the first time in years, providing funding for 3,300 new council houses.
We’ve reformed the Right to Buy in order to protect social housing for rent.
We’ve helped over 5,300 people buy their first home with our shared equity scheme.
We’ve helped 10,000 pensioners and families secure £1.6 million in savings through our benefits health check.
We’ve invested £17 million in the establishment of world class multi-sport facilities at Aberdeen Sports Village, Toryglen Regional Indoor Football Training Centre, and Ravenscraig Sports Centre.
We’ve invested £7.5 million to improve our medal hopes in 2012 and 2014 with World Class facilities for training for our elite and emerging athletes.
We’ve delivered the smallest average primary school class sizes ever, and set a new legal limit of 25 pupils for primary one.
Since the last election, 330 schools will have been built or refurbished - 80 more than planned by Labour.
We have lifted over 130,000 pupils out of crumbling school buildings.
We’ve raised standards in schools by introducing the new Curriculum for Excellence.
We’ve increased funding for college bursaries to a record £89 million, supporting a record 42,000 students.
We’ve expanded free nursery education, benefitting 100,000 children.
We’ve given legal protection to rural schools, preventing unnecessary closure.
We’re helping less well-off youngsters by continuing the £30-a-week Educational Maintenance Allowance – now scrapped in England.
We’ve introduced tough new qualifications – the Scottish Baccalaureate – in science and languages, challenging the brightest pupils to achieve more.
We’ve helped 250,000 people expand their learning with Individual Learning Accounts to pay for training courses.
We’ve extended free school meals to 55,000 children from lower income families.
We’ve helped home-grown talent perform in Edinburgh with a £6 million Expo Fund for the City’s festivals.
We’ve reformed the unique and successful Children’s Hearing System to make it fit for the future.
We’ve made sure children who need additional support to learn get the help they need with new laws and guidance for all schools.
More than 2,600 primary children are now able to learn in dedicated Gaelic language classes, up by a fifth since 2007.
We’ve protected more than 15,000 jobs in Scotland during the recession, including by accelerating spending on nearly £350 million of public projects as part of our comprehensive Economic Recovery Plan.
We’ve put Scotland on course to exceed our interim target of 31 per cent of Scotland’s electricity from clean green renewable sources this year. And we’re on track for 80 per cent by 2020.
The approval we’ve given for a desperately needed new Forth Road Bridge will ease congestion, cut journey times, boost business and secure some 3,000 jobs.
We’ve delivered an extra £2.3 billion for jobs and public services by driving up efficiency in government – far exceeding the target of 1.5% efficiency savings.
We’ve established a £10 million national life sciences institute in Dundee.
We’ve funded improvements to major roads across the country including the M8, the M80, the A9, A90 and A96. We’re also completing the M74 - bringing new jobs and helping local regeneration.
We’ve protected Scotland’s pensioners from UK cuts by guaranteeing free bus travel, and we are extending the scheme to injured veterans.
We’ve successfully completed one of the largest rail projects in Scotland for decades, with the opening of the Airdrie-Bathgate rail line.
We’ve helped tourism and the local economy in the Western Isles through a pilot scheme to reduce ferry fares.
We’ve funded improvements in rail services and journey times from Inverness, Aberdeen, Dundee and Perth to Glasgow and Edinburgh.
We’ve invested £2.4 billion in improving the nation’s water infrastructure, and published proposals to boost the role of Scottish Water, publicly owned for the public benefit.
We’re on track to slash the number of quangos by more than a quarter.
We’ve established Public Contracts Scotland, a website that makes it easier than ever for small businesses to access government contacts.
We’ve invested £2 million in small post offices, helping 49 businesses expand and stay open.
We have established the Scottish Investment Fund to help grassroots business projects get up and running.
We’ve reformed Scottish Enterprise so that it focuses on growth sectors, growth markets and growth companies – boosting key industries such as renewables, financial services and life sciences.
We delivered Scotland’s first ever year of Homecoming in 2009, encouraging more than 95,000 visitors to travel to Scotland and exceeding its target by generating £53.7 million in additional tourism revenue.
Violent crime is down by over a fifth since the SNP came to office, with nearly 3,000 fewer violent offences last year.
We’ve used over £30 million seized from criminal behaviour to invest in community projects for over 300,000 Scottish kids.
Fear of crime has fallen – and the risk of becoming a victim of crime continues to fall, and is lower than south of the Border.
Knife crime is down by 30 per cent since this government took office, but we must and will step up efforts to keep driving this figure down.
We’ve delivered faster justice, with three-quarters of cases completed within six months – compared to only two-thirds in 2006/07. And criminals are being locked up for longer, with prison sentences at their longest for a decade.
We’ve put in place new measures to cut the cycle of re-offending with tough community punishment.
We’ve reformed the laws on sexual offences to make it easier to prosecute people for serious sexual attacks.
We’ve increased funding for Victim Support Scotland, and our victim notification scheme is helping people affected by crime.
We’re tackling Scotland’s drug problem head-on through our national drugs commission, the new national drugs strategy, and 20 per cent more funding to help people recover from addiction.
We’ve provided parents with more information on dangerous paedophiles to protect children in local communities.
We’ve given the go ahead to a new prison for the North East of Scotland, as part of our prison building programme.
We are building the Gartcosh crime campus, and have established the Serious and Organised Crime Taskforce.
We’ve provided Citizens Advice Scotland with extra funding to provide advice and support to families facing debt problems.
We are reforming the law on Double Jeopardy, to help ensure that the guilty do not escape justice.
We’ve introduced world leading Climate Change legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 42 per cent by the end of the decade.
We’ve secured £1.6 billion of investment for Scotland’s rural economy through the Scottish Rural Development Programme.
Scotland is clean as well as green - under an SNP Government, recycling is at its highest level ever.
We have developed a non-nuclear energy strategy for Scotland, including working with partners to progress the concept of a European Super Grid to export our surplus power.
We’ve promoted Scotland’s top quality produce – sales of Scottish food and drink have increased by 30 per cent since the SNP came to office.
We’ve helped make our communities safer from flooding with investment in flood defences and new measures in the Flooding Act.
We’ve backed consumers with a continued ban on planting GM crops in Scotland.
We’ve developed Conservation Credits, catch quotas and on-board CCTV, working with fishermen to develop and implement fisheries policies right for the 21st century.
We are the first administration to introduce a scheme dedicated to encouraging new entrants into farming, worth £10 million.
We’ve delivered the Wildlife and Natural Environment Bill, toughening up wildlife crime measures and protecting Scotland’s environment as one of our greatest assets.
We’ve passed a Crofting Reform Act, tackling absenteeism, neglect and speculation to protect crofting for future generations.
With your support we can build on the work of the past four years. Progress has been made and there is more to do. Together, we can make Scotland better.

97 comments:
Pedant as I am, should "Go forth and proper"
not be
Go forth and procreate?
Suitably amended M'Lord. I suspect I've watched too much Star Trek, albeit in a sloppy spelling fashion....
Absolutely fantastic article Mark.
Any voter looking at the positive record and agenda the SNP offers and then comparing it to the negative party politics of the main opposition lot, would not have to think too long or hard as to where to put the X at the ballot box.
The Scottish media really has a lot to answer for, for their utter biased reporting and sometimes down right lies.
I can't remember the last time I physically went into a shop and bought a Scottish Newspaper, I wouldn't want any of the shi#e touching my hands.
A few home truths you have touched on Mark in this article!!
Absolutely brilliant Mark, can I use it in local papers up here in Paisley. It sums everything up perfectly.
Go for it Mike.
Juat musing in passing - why is the font so big? And I have to scroll past so much stuff to get to your post. I love what you have to say, but I wish it wasn't so tiring to read it. Oh, go on then - tell me to piss off.
That'll be the downside of infirmity, Vronsky. Larger font and a prescription monitor.
I'll try and lessen the impact for the next expulsion of vowels and consonants...
Hi Mark
I had been busy sniping at Mr MacDonell on the CalMerc for a while when the ed challenged me to do better.
So I did an article on how Press reporting is a bit awful, using the Health Debate.
You did better, but I feel slightly chuffed to have been published on the CalMerc the same week as the infamous Mark MacLachlan.
It'd be interesting of others take up his offer of writing articles, I assume they'll get paid the same rate as me
Bill Wallace
Thanks Bill, as May zooms into focus, I think the Caledonian Mercury realises the need to have a counterbalance to Mr McDonnell's one dimesional take on Scottish politics. His defence of Bill Aitken's kippering was perhaps a leap too far.
Yes, others should take up the gauntlet, I'm intending on stretching my retirement on the largesse handed to me...oh wait there wasn't any!
The crucial point is that more and more of us should be taking to the blogosphere, even if it's only for a one off rant/dissection or coverage of a story that the dead tree press haven't covered.
I've got an average of 3,000 folk a week passing through the cheesey blog, this post alone has garnered nearly 4000 since being published. If anyone reading this has something to say and doesn't have a desire to through the all the rigmarole of setting up a blog, give me a shout I'll host your guest posts.
cheers
Mark
Mark,
I know you said you're list wasn't
exhaustive, but suggest you could have included another "biggie", namely the building of affordable housing (mainly by Housing Association with SG grants), but also by Councils--something which was NOT done under the previous muppets.
Sadly this will not be happening in 2011/12 since the UK Govt. has cut the Housing Budget hugely and the Barnett consequentials have kicked in, although the Councils can continue their programmes.
So lots of needy Scots families were housed and construction workers kept their jobs.
Good point William, if memory serves me well, the previous Labour Liberal Democrat coalition government only built six council homes in their period in office.
There's also a plethora of things that Labour have failed to support, like the fair deal for fuel motion yesterday or those they've actively voted against.
The karaoke superstar Bob Doris MSP has higlighted a great list of those on his blog http://tinyurl.com/6aegzso
Particularly the following:
* Invest a further £11.5 million to create 25,000 modern apprenticeship places - a record high for Scotland
* Abolition of prescription charges and the Council tax freeze;
* Continuing Small Business Bonus Scheme;
* Invest an additional £15 million across 2010-11 and 2011-12 in funding for college bursaries;
* 1,000 additional police officers;
* £10 million support for SME employment creation - focused on new starts, sole traders and small firms to take on new employees by assisting with employment and recruitment costs and assist with exports
* Provide 7,000 flexible training opportunities for SMEs - 2,000 more than originally planned in the draft Budget
* Invest £8 million to provide enough funding for an extra 1,200 college places
* Maintain educational grants (EMAs) for pupils and college students most in need which were cut south of the border;
* Extending the Living Wage of £7.15 to all agencies the Government is responsible for and Scotland's NHS.
* Guarantee a probation place for every newly-qualified teacher and provide enough teaching jobs for every post-probationer in 2011-12;
* New Early Years and Early Intervention Fund, with start-up funding of £5 million;
* £2m Freight Facilities Grant;
* £1m Post office Diversification Scheme;
* £12.5 million for Urban Regeneration Companies - increase of £6 million on the Draft budget;
* £16 million further investment in Housing;
* Protect Health Spending and continue provisions for free personal care;
* £2.5 billion infrastructure investment programme;
* Infrastructure Commitments such as the new Forth crossing, New South Glasgow Hospitals project and school building programme
* £70 million Renewables Infrastructure Fund - over four years;
* £48 million support for energy assistance package and Home Insulation Scheme.
Matched Labour's school building programme brick for brick (not)
Built no schools actually (yes)
Class sizes of 18 (not)
Scrap council tax (not)
Sack 3000 teachers (yes)
Abolished PPP (not)
Insisted that all new build ACTUALLY USE PPP (yes)
Introduced a LIT (not)
Abolished student debt (not)
Introduced a starter pack for all first time buyers (not)
Built more homes (not)
and...
...ta-ra...
a referendum on "independence"....(NOT)!!!
I could go on....
1st March 2011 Right To Buy abolished for new tenants.
That was a good bit too.
Oh please do Braveheart...
OK,
the SNP's promise to give all school kids year round access to council swimming pools kept (not).
Is that it then? Nothing else?
And some of the stuff you claim as good news and attributable to the SNP is just as likely to be the continuation of a trend, chance, demographics or the result of work of previous administrations.
e.g. crime has been on a downward trend for ten years as the numbers of young males (who commit most crimes statistically) in the population has decreased. At the same time the 1997 Labour administration also hired many more police after the Tory lean years, which may have had a positive effect.
The SNP hasn't (apparently) made the situation any worse.
Hoo. Ray.
Ahh the cry of the Labourite bien pensant, have to say it leaves me hugely underwhelmed.
Where are the acclaimed 100 SNP broken promises, used to such hilarious effect during SLAB's day of hot twitter action?
"The SNP hasn't (apparently) made the situation any worse."
Isn't that perilously close to treason for Labourites? We've been lead to believe from your friends in the media that Scotland is unhealthier, poorer, dangerous, unfair, thicker, polluted and a lot more difficult to do business in...
Rather than waffle through the minutiae of your broken record, let me ask you when this rather important and greatest of all Scottish Labour manifesto pledges is ever going to be met?
'My programme for power offers the Scottish people Scottish solutions to Scottish problems, and so ensures that in key areas of policy Scotland leads Britain.'
Donald Dewar April 13th 1999
Mark, don't wish to be rude but I am not concerned if it leaves you underwhelmed, overwhelmed or just averagely whelmed. It's not personal.
That said, stripping the insults and sarcasm out of you reply, I find not a lot else there.
So I'll just keep going on the theme of the post..
Right. I would observe that the things you claim as great successes are, mainly, the meat of everyday government. And the things the SNP has failed to do are it's biggest promises, the things they fought at the 2007 election. I.e. build schools "brick for brick", abolish PPP, abolish council tax, introduce a local income tax, abolish student debt, class sizes of 18. etc.
These are the things that were prominent in the election campaign and that then public voted on and remembers.
The only real positives that you can remotely claim is cutting prescription charges and 1000 police (although that's also disputed) which the Tories bought for budget support.
The negative "saved local A&Es" is true, but the suspicion remains that the Kerr/Kerr prescription of centres of excellence is actually the best way forward for the NHS. It is now being seriously looked at in England.
p.s yet again it's a nat that introduces the "too wee, too poor" mantra.
It's always a puzzle to me that you guys appear to hate our country so much. Why is that?
Hate is such a strong word. Personally speaking I don't do hate it's such a heavy burden to carry. Remember old bean hate is easy, it's love that's difficult...
You seem a reasonable sort of chap, erudite, rational and quite capable. As you'll have read above the theme of the post is actually ‘What the SNP could have done for us, but were stopped from doing.’
Now I'd really appreciate it if you could take your Labour bunnet off for a minute or so and rationally explain to the folks that read this, why Labour voted against introducing a minimum alcohol unit price, offered no amendments or even floated the idea of a sunset clause to the legislation, yet now claim through Jackie Baillie, "If Labour forms the next Government in Scotland we will seriously consider measures to increase the price of alcohol."
Please give it a bash.
cheers.
Here's the link to the Labour supporting paper that carries the quote...
http://www.thesun.co.uk/scotsol/homepage/news/3428419/40000-boozer-losers.html#ixzz1FcwwSlb6
Seriously, why is it always the nationalists that bring up the "too wee, too poor" argument? And I do mean always. I have never heard the point made by anyone other than a nationalist, usually in an exchange like this, and you just did it again.
As for minimum pricing, I have little knowledge of the pros and cons, but hasn't there just been analysis that showed that the chosen levels of pricing make no difference at all at supermarket prices? i.e. the so-called minimum price that the legislation demands is above the current shop price?
In which it would have no effect on sales and the real problem remains unaddressed.
I've addressed your point, could you address mine please...
Governments do many things, but te important matters are employment, education, policing and health.
Let's start with PPP. The SNP attacked PPP relentlessly. They would abolish it as soon as poss and replace it with a Scottish Futures Trust. The SDT bombed, and now we find that e.g. for new schools projects which the Parliament supports, councils have been directed to use the NPD model of PPP.
So the failure on PPP is that it was never abolished, it was never replaced by a SFT and, while waiting for these promises to be broken, no new schools were commissioned, and now councils have been instructed to use PPP after all. Four years (at least) have been wasted....
On my scale, that's a much bigger crime than not backing an iffy alcohol pricing measure that may or may not work.
@Mark
"...theme of the post is actually ‘What the SNP could have done for us, but were stopped from doing.’ "
Mark, no-one stopped the SNP from e.g. introducing a SFT. It was never a possibility because it was a promise made on a policy that had never been worked out propoerly, and in the cold light of day, it just didn't work.
You'll find that empty promises is a theme of the SNP 2007 manifesto.
Here's another: no-one stopped the SNP matching Labour's school building programme brick for brick, as they promised to do. It was their own idealogical contortions and incompetence that did that.
Minority government is about consensus, Labour failing to even engage with the debate and then turn coat and support it only if they are in power is hypocrisy of the highest order.
I don't claim to know enough about the inner workings of PFI/PPP. All I know is that locally it's burdened my kids future here in Dumbfreaks and Galloway with a massive bloody council debt circa £20 million per year for the next 31 years, until 2041/42...
Oh and also the fact that your reports of the SFT demise are a tad premature. Last year SFT reported savings of £111 million on the work programme it managed and looks to be on target for savings in the £120m - £130m region for 2010/11.
I suspect we'll get those figures at the end of the month...
Hey don't take my word for it, have a look at their website
http://www.scottishfuturestrust.org.uk/
Or even better read what Bill Jamieson has to say about, jings the old arch-unionist Darvel boy seems to thinks it's a model that any new Labour government in Holyrood will retain...
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/business/Bill-Jamieson-SFT-has-a.6725018.jp?articlepage=1
Tell you what here's a genuine offer. Why don't you write a guest post for this here Cheesey blog on why you think Scotland should vote for the return of a Labour government in May?
I'll moderate all comments, anything abusive I'll simply not allow. What do you think?
Mark, You might not like PPP, but the SNP government is insisting that LAs use it for future projects. The point being that, while waiting for PPP to be abolished and a SFT set up, we have had virtually no public sector projects of any size. In particular no new schools funded from Holyrood. Now PPP is the only game in town.
It's a disgrace, frankly.
There is indeed an organisation with notepaper which is headed "Scottish Futures Trust", but it's not what was promised. There is no "trust" which contains money and provides interest and which interest is available to fund capital projects, as per the manifesto promise.
The so-called SFT is in fact a mechanism for producing notional savings through volume procurement, a trick that has been tried before and failed. So I would take the £111 million claimed savings with a lorryload of salt if I was you.
And whether a future labour administration would keep it would depend on the solidity of those savings and whether they could be predicted to continue in future.
But whatever, a Procurement Hub is not a Futures Trust.
"The so-called SFT is in fact a mechanism for producing notional savings through volume procurement, a trick that has been tried before and failed. So I would take the £111 million claimed savings with a lorryload of salt if I was you."
Michty, but didn't Broon try something similar with with his Infrastructure UK scheme?
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ppp_infrastructureuk.htm
Soo I take it you don't fancy my offer of a guest post? You could use it to show what the positive effects of New Labour have been in say their heartland of North Lanarkshire. Let's hear about all the great stuff they've done in Motherwell, Bellshill, Airdrie, Coatbridge, Wishaw etcetera
As I said, it's been tried before, but not successfully.
So don't let the title decieve you that it's an actual Futures Trust, Scottish or any otheer denomination.
It is, in fact, another failed SNP promise....
Imagine what could have been achieved if Labour had worked with the SNP for the benefit of Scotland. But no - instead they posture and prattle, girn and greet, block and bemoan - that is their essence - saboteurs and poseurs the lot.
I agree with McGonagall. Imagine what could have been achieved if the SNP had worked with the Labour for the benefit of the Scottish people. But no - instead they go on about "indepndence" and lose sight of the real problems like schools and housing and unemployment that could be addressed so much better if they would lose their daft obsession with something that's never going to happen and if it did would be a disaster for the scottish people.
Well Braveheart - as we see today even Wendy Alexander is now stating that the Scottish Parliament needs capital borrowing powers - do you think that would have happened under a Scottish Labour Executive?
You can slag off the Scottish Futures Trust as much as you want, however the SNP have an ideological opposition to PFI & that argument is winning the day.
The SNP have done a lot of things - like making the NHS free at the point of need, like stopping right to buy, like rejecting PFI as the only game in town, that Labour should have done & to their eternal shame didn't.
You can easily say ''manifesto commitments not kept'' in relation to a minority government, like a schoolboy pulling the wings off a fly. In the real world minority governments can only push through what they can get agreement on.
But Scotland now is a very different place from the Scotland that the SNP inherited in 2007. Ironically it is a lot more like the Scotland many Labour voters would like.
That was very kind of the SNP, wasn't it.
& all that the Labour Party in Scotland could do is moan like a bunch of weans.
Housing Braveheart?
That's my subject - are you sure you want to go there?
I can wax lyrical for hours on the enormous changes the SNP have brought about - investing in Council housing again, no more enforced stock transfer, cutting the Gordian knot that was the GHA, abolishing the right to buy.
I could bore for Scotland, or in your case Britain...
@Observer "You can slag off the Scottish Futures Trust as much as you want.."
No need to .. there is no Scottish Futures Trust. It's a procurement exercise with 4 men in an offce and Microsoft Project software for recording the work that others are actually doing.
"... however the SNP have an ideological opposition to PFI & that argument is winning the day..."
Don't know if you have read all of the thread Observer, but the SNP government is insisting that councils use PFI for large projects.... no choice, you have to use the NPD model of PFI if you want the money...
So much for "idealogical opposition"..... craven cave-in... now that's the truth.
Mark: Completely brilliant post. Thank you. I've book marked it.
You post too infrequently for my liking.
''but the SNP government is insisting that councils use PFI for large projects.... no choice, you have to use the NPD model of PFI if you want the money...''
That is inaccurate on a number of levels. Councils are ultimately in charge of how they fund their capital projects, they can buy into, & they have been, the SFT model of procurement, but the SNP govt can't insist.
I am not about to defend the SFT as it is a relative of PFI, but it is a lesser evil & in the absence of borrowing powers needs must.
You are all over the place here, in one breath you are claiming that the SNP's opposition to PFI resulted in no new public sector projects (which is untrue)then in the other breath you are slagging them off for using a method of funding which seeks to minimise private profit, but nonetheless is funding capital investment in a non traditional way.
It appears to me that you are just opposing for the sake of it, just like your party does.
Sorry Observer, it's you that's wrong on so many levels.
Let's start with: "...they can buy into, & they have been, the SFT model of procurement, but the SNP govt can't insist."
Of course councils can raise the finance in other ways. But in that case the Holyrood administration claims no responsibility or credit for the project.
And in any case, the SFT provides no money. The SFT is not a method of finance. The SFT is a method of volume purchasing.
But when the government is supplying some of the capital (as the Labour led government did when puting up 60% (approx) of cash for PPP schools. )the SNP administration can insist on how the project is manged and funded.
The SNP government is only providing 50% in the case of most new school build, and it is insisting that the NPD model is used. Check with your Holyrood contacts if you don't believe me.
and "I am not about to defend the SFT as it is a relative of PFI, but it is a lesser evil & in the absence of borrowing powers needs must."
The SFT is not a model of financing, it is a method of procurement. There is no "trust". There is no fund of cash. There is no allocation of the proceeds to capital projects. There is help with volume purchasing. The SFT is a purchasing mechanism, it is not a method of finance
"You are all over the place here, in one breath you are claiming that the SNP's opposition to PFI resulted in no new public sector projects (which is untrue).."
I said we had "virtually no public sector projects of any size" Which is true. E.g. there has not been one new school built with matching Holyroood money in the four years since the SNP took "power".
"..then .....you are slagging them off for using a method of funding which seeks to minimise private profit, but nonetheless is funding capital investment in a non traditional way".
I am slagging them off ( as you put it) for opposing PPP so hard, for promsing to abolish PPP, for promising to replace PPP with a new financing method called The Scottish Futures Trust and for doing all this with such vehemence and at such lengths that that no new schools get built in 4 years (no schools in 4 years!!!)
Now, they are insisting on PPP for new projects. Some school spending was authorised last year, but it has not been spent yet. The SNP is insisting that councils use PPP for those schoool projects. Check with your Holyrood contacts if you don't believe me.
The result of all this ideology and incompetence is that not one new school project sponsored from Holyrood has been been completed in the whole 4 years of our first ( and hopefully last) incompetent SNP administration.
That's why I'm slagging them off. And if it was a Labour administration and you were not blinded by party loyalty, you would be slagging them off too.
Let me put that more simply and (I hope) more clearly.
Before the got elected, the SNP attacked PPP by exaggerating it's drawbacks and minimising its advantages.
The SNP said that they would abolish PPP.
The SNP said that PPP would be replaced by a Scottish Futures Trust.
The SNP said that the Scottish Futures Trust would be a new method of financing capital projects.
The SNP also said it would use the SCottish Futures Trust to match Labour's school building programme "brick for brick".
The SNP gathered oodles of protest votes against PPP, and on the promise to build many new schools (as Labour had done) helping them to be the biggest party in Holyrood. Huzzah!!!
When the SNP took power, it stopped all new school funding from Holyrood because it refused to use PPP to fund new schools and wanted the SFT to provide the funding mechanism.
Unfortunately, after 3 years of harrumphing, the SFT was still a blob of fantasy: nobody knew what it was, what it meant, how it would be funded, how it would work... nothing. A mess.
In 2010 the Education Minister was acked and a new one appointed. Some money was, at last, released to councils to build schools (50% matched rather than the 60% from Labour, but it was something...).
14 new secondaries were identified.....
Meanwhile an organisation called the Scottish Futures Trust was established. It had no money in any "trust". It was not a method of financing new projects. It was, in fact, that old chestnut, "free" money from better purchasing.... two men and a Microsoft Project software package. Tried before, failed before.
To give the cottish Futures Trust its due, it is Scottish....
Then it emerged that a condition of geting the funding from Holyrood was that the NPD/PPP method has to be used to finance and run the new schoools projects.
So. The whole sorry saga..... the SNP refuses for idealogical reasons to use PPP. It fails to produce a financing mechanism for capital projects. It then ressurrects PPP and insists that councils use it.
Incompetence. Ideaology. Ignorance. And straightforward lies.
And no new government funded schools in 4 years.
A complete and utter fiasco and disgrace.
Braveheart - I am not an SNP activist. The only card I have is a union one.
I agree with you that the Scottish Futures Trust is not a funding mechanism per se. It is essentially a private limited company running on non-profit distributing principles.
Although it won't make a profit others certainly will.
That is why I said that I wouldn't defend it - I will say however that when compared to the billions of odious debt that PFI left behind the model the SNP are using is ten times better.
And remember Braveheart - the SNP don't want to use non conventional means of funding - they want the Parliament to have borrowing powers, which is really the only way to avoid using non traditional funding.
As we know that is one of the proposals that Wendy Alexander has put forward in relation to the Scotland Bill. Finally making ours a Parliament that can borrow.
Do you think that would have happened without the SNP?
I don't.
Observer, it's not about you or me, it's about the fact that (among other facts) the SNP lied about having a Scottish Futures Trust ready for use in 2007 when they did not and putting it in their manifesto and getting votes on the basis of those lies.
And being lying and incompetent when saying they would abolish PPP when there was no alternative. And when they said they would build schools but failed to do so.
And then by being hypocritical by insisting that councils, after being told for 3 years not to use PPP, being ordered to use PPP.
It's not about political points scoring, it's about our voters and pupils and parents and teachers being lied to and let down.
It's not relevant whether you are an SNP activist, it's relevant that you recognise the facts.
Braveheart, you'll understand if I don't take lessons on the alleged lies and hypocrisy of a minority government especially when coming from a Labour apologist whose party have lied and been entirely hypocritical on a multitude of levels when both in and out of power. Iraq, WMD, cash for honours, expenses, sleaze, corruption. You have to do a huge amount of swallowing to support Labour, but hey each to their own.
@Mark
"..... you'll understand if I don't take lessons on the alleged lies and hypocrisy of a minority government ..."
as you said on 4th March @ 10.58
"....the theme of the post is actually ‘What the SNP could have done for us, but were stopped from doing....."
That's the theme I was pursuing, strange that now, suddenly, you don't want to pursue it...
.....and revealing...
Harldy revealing old fruit, I have offered you the opportunity of a guest blog post which you've managed to avoid responding to with great subtlety. Give it a go...
@Mark,
As I commented to McGonagall, I'm sure you didn't offer the guest blog just to cry "chicken" if I refused it. That would be a reprehensible motive and morally and ethically questionable. And that's just not you, is it?
But still, the offer, it's acceptance or refusal, has nothing to do with the theme of the post which is, as you say ".......What the SNP could have done for us, but were stopped from doing.....".
Which theme I was expanding on and which you now wish to abandon, or at least change the subject.
as I also said: revealing.
The offer was and is genuine. I have no intention of calling you 'chicken', you're more than capable of standing up for yourself.
Surely it would be more 'revealing' if I hadn't published any of your fifteen comments?
I'm trying to foster debate, to perhaps see you loosen your rigid stance and appreciate that what a political party says in its manifesto is normally predicated on it achieving a majority to make these manifesto 'aspirations' a reality.
Sorry Mark, it's just that saw the dragging in of Iraq and MPs expenses as a diversion.
If that's not the case, we can just get on with discussing who stopped the SNP from initiating a Local Income Tax, and who stopped them abolishing PPP, and who stopped them building any new schools..
That'd be fine by me....
Mark, a stupendous article, not least the prose which continues to astound and amuse -"dribbling sockpuppets"? :-)
I see this Braveheart thing, a very familiar and odious type ("...revealing...") has declined the offer of a guest blog and chooses to ignore SNP government achievements and fixate on PPP/PPI. Most odd
Yours aye
@Ayrshire Scot, what do you think of a government which doesn't build schools or hospitals?
In my opinion that would indicate they weren't much use.
What's your opinion?
As Ayrshire Scot rarely visits, I'll ask on his behalf...
Does the finally approved 1109 bed, entirely publicly funded at a cost of £842 million, new Southern General Hospital in the Glasgow that the SNP allegedly hate count?
It counts, but it's not yet built...
Braveheart
the two term Lib/Labour Executive built 8 council houses in Scotland bewteen 1999 and 2007. Since 2007 council and social housing new build in Scotland has increased by an order of magnitude.
The SNP has funded the new Southern General hospital, part of which is already in use. The SNP has also initiated the new Forth Road bridge. The last Labour administration were closing A&E units at Ayr and Monklands - they are still open under the SNP. Your claim that the SNP hasn't built any hospitals looks like a lie and a spin-type falsehood at that when the biggest NHS buidling project in Scotland has been funded and built under the SNP. Do you think that telling obvious porkies helps your "cause"?
Mark
£842 million, for the New Southern General, is very similar to the final cost to the tax payer for the Hairmyres PPP debacle. Hairmyres having a capital value of around £92 million but oddly ended up costing the taxpayer 10 times as much. This is the type of incompetent gouging of the taxpayer and massive debt incurrence that "Braveheart" lambasts the SNP for not doing enough of? How curious. What a chap, what an agenda.
Of course, I suppose the Unionist parties can be proud of the Edinburgh tram scheme they all backed which is delivering such marvellous results and indeed the very Holyrood Parliament building which was constructed as such great cost efficiency.
@ayrshire scot "the two term Lib/Labour Executive built 8 council houses in Scotland bewteen 1999 and 2007. Since 2007 council and social housing new build in Scotland has increased by an order of magnitude."
You are mixing up two categories. Council Housing and Social Housing. Council Houses are Social Housing, but not all Social housing is Council Housing.
I have no idea how many concil houses were built between 1999 and 2007. But many social houses were built by councils and housing associations.
"..Since 2007 council and social housing new build in Scotland has increased by an order of magnitude."
Aye right. What order of magnitude woud that be...?
I do know that the subsidy per house that the Holyrood government allocates to Housing Associations has been cut for the last two years..... so it's unlikely to be an order of magnitude greater than 1....!!!
Anyway, await the figures and your source.
The Joseph Rowntree Foundation thinks the SNP is all at sea on the issue of social housing, BTW.
http://www.jrf.org.uk/blog/2011/02/delivering-new-affordable-housing-scotland
Braveheart - you said the SNP hasn't built any hospitals.
It is a fact that the biggest hospital build project in Scotland's recent history has been funded and built by the SNP.
Why did you lie?
Do you think blatant lies and untruths are useful political "weapons"?
Are you a spin merchant?
@ayrshire scot...
They've started to build a hospital....That''s something I suppose, .....
"Vote SNP and we'll build a tenth of a hospital every four years..."
That'll do it no sweat....
Braveheart you seem to be completely closed to reason.
Do you not understand the magnitude of the debt that PFI has landed us with.
Do you not understand that the last Labour government ensured that PFI debts must be paid - even when everything else is being cut?
You are quite right to say that the SFT is a relative of PFI - but it's a lesser evil. A much lesser evil & now we are talking - finally - of getting borrowing powers for the Scottish Parliament which is what was needed all the time.
I asked you a question - would that have happened without an SNP govt?
Yes or no.
You chose to focus on the method of financing capital investment so you should have the grace to answer the question.
Braveheart - on the subject of social housing I suggest you educate yourself about how much money the last Labour Executive spent on pursuing their woefully misguided policy of stock transfer. That is money spent on a policy & not on actual housing. If you are honest it will shock you rigid.
& please also remember that a tiny little blip happened between the last Labour Executive pre 2007 & the current SNP government circa 2011.
Can you guess what it was?
@Observer "Do you not understand the magnitude of the debt that PFI has landed us with."
Do you not understand that the SNP is insisting that councils use PFI to build new schools?
And if Labour are derelict for using PFI, so is the SNP. Equal fault or equal praise...
But somehow the nats want to criticise Labour for PFI, but ignore that the SNP is now insisting on the use of PFI.
I've posed this a dozen times on this thread, and I have not yet got a straightforward honest acknowledgement of the SNP's two-faced incompetence.
Could you be the first..?
Crivens this is like dragging Diogenes out of his tub. Braveheart, I salute your indefatagibilty, your perspicacity and your determination to hold on to this one bone that the SFT didn't materialise effectively as was hoped for.
Dragging Diogenes out of the pub??!! ..have you got Greek mates, Mark?
As for the "idefatigability" stuff, I pursued the PPP thingy here, and only the PPP thingy, because, in my experience, it's dangerous to give nats two things to think about at once. It confuses the poor wee souls and they get angry and aggressive. It also gives them the excuse of wandering off the subject which they like to do because, whatever the subject, when it comes to facts, reason and evidence, they are usually losing the argument....
I just love your confession that "...the SFT didn't materialise effectively as was hoped for..."
Priceless :)
Have you ever seen the Monty Python sketch about the parrot...?
"...this is a deceased parrot, it is dead and gone before..".
Just substitute "parrot" with "Scottish Futures Trust" and you'll get somewhere near the truth...except, at least the parrot had a life, the SFT never actually achieved any sentient state...
Anyweys, what do you think of the SNP actively endorsing PPP?
Good idea?
Betrayal of manifesto promise?
Realism sets in at last?
After everything they said....
Ahh I presumed you were versed in the classics. Diogenes of Sinope was so stubborn that he spent his time in a tub, not a pub. He also spent his days wandering about during daylit hours with a lamp, looking for an honest man, something many of us on this side of the argument feel like doing when looking for an honest Labour supporter.
And I presumed you had a sense of humour...
I didn't presume that you would answer a straight question, such as;
"...what do you think of the SNP actively endorsing PPP? Good idea? Betrayal of manifesto promise? Realism sets in at last?.."
..and it seems that I was right...
Like to give it a try? After all you've more or less admitted that the SFT is a dog's arse... how about twisting arms to use PPP...?
"Scotland is particularly exposed to rising PFI costs because of Scottish local authorities signed up to far more deals than their counterparts south of the Border, with Scotland having 40 per cent of the UK's PFI school projects."
There you go decades of Labour neglect to the public estate...
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Scots-facing-a-39council-tax.6731463.jp?articlepage=2
Mark, I know that PFI is evil, I've been told that a thousand times by SNP supporters (all those schools that got build, dreadful...).
The question I asked is: what do you think of the SNP insisting that councils use the hated PFI for new schools (and maybe other) projects?
I'm glad you think that neglecting the public estate is a bad thing because, earlier in this thread, I pointed out that the SNP government has not built one new school in its 4 years of "power".
So, if you don't want to address the broad PFI/PPP question maybe you could address the neglect of the public estate question...?
Too much to ask..?
http://www2.snp.org/
http://www.scottishlabour.org.uk/100brokenSNPpromises
Your point is?
Jings feller, you're like a chuffing stalker, you weren't at the bottom of my garden this morning were you?
I think I'm entitled to make a point on my site and add the additional video and list of achievements from the PPB.
Go on knock yourself out denying them...
Have a nice weekend...
Oh and for your consideration old fruit 13,304 people signed up to www.snp.org just 2 hours after launch....
Not denying, but questioning: e.g. "We have frozen Council Tax for four years, saving an average family more than £300."
Cutting taxes is the same as cutting services. It may be popular, but if it means deserving causes are damaged, it's not for me.
To emphasise the point, freezing Council Tax was a Tory policy before it was SNP policy. Because Tories hate taxes and hate public services. Strange that the "left wing" SNP agrees.
"We’ve slashed or abolished business rates for some 80,000 small firms and local employers, protecting jobs in tough times."
Cutting Business rates was also Tory policy before it was SNP policy (it was the basis of the Irish "miracle" as well). And, although some businesses have benefited, some have lost out.. you don't mention them.
"We’ve put 1,000 more police on Scotland’s streets, helping drive crime down to its lowest level for 32 years."
Another Tory policy. But ok in itself and an achievement of sorts.
"We’ve abolished prescription charges, saving people with long-term illnesses an average of more than £180."
Given that the young, the chronically ill, pensioners and those on benefits were already exempt, the SNP has reduced prescription charges for those who could (in most part) afford to pay, and the money could perhaps have been better spent. However, not bad.
"The National Conversation launched in 2007 revived progress on the constitutional debate in Scotland, and paves the way for an independence referendum in the next parliament."
There's always space for comedy. :)
And would that referendum on independence be in the same 100 days as the SNP promised that last one... :):)
"We’ve restored free higher education by ruling out upfront fees and abolishing the £2,300 graduate endowment - a back door tuition fee."
Although we actually promised to abolish student debt altogether...
Still, a crumb...
"We’re delivering a record-breaking 25,000 modern apprenticeships in the year ahead – a two-thirds increase on 2007."
We haven't actualy delivered 25,000 apprenticeships....but we're trying...
"We have provided vital support for the staging of two of the world’s greatest sporting events here in Scotland in 2014 – the Commonwealth games in Glasgow and the Ryder Cup at Gleneagles. This includes the building of a new National Indoor Sports Arena and the Sir Chris Hoy Velodrome."
Eh?
What about the Commonwealth brass neck chamionships...?
"We’ve started 24,000 social sector homes since coming into office in 2007 – that’s an average of 115 new houses every week. "
Interesting that the SNP claims credit here for STARTING houses... which is ok by me, it's a good thing to start new houses.
But they always claim credit for COMPLETING 230 schools (which they had nothing to do with creating at all)...
hypocrisy, do you think?
Yep!
"We've matched Labour's school building programme brick for brick".
Oh!
Wait!
Don't hit the enter button!
Shit...
..it's all right, nobody will notice.
Will they...?
actually, shooting fish in a barrel... it's getting boring, even for me...
but still, I might be back...
Crivens seven post mentalism! Classic example of the need for computers to come equipped with that delightful portmanteau, the breathalyser...
Now don't panic old fruit, but Iain Gray, the future glorious leader appears to have suffered from a shuddering U-turn and backed the freezing of the council tax!
Well they do say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12722355
"The announcement marks an apparent change of direction for the party, as Mr Gray had previously indicated he would cap council tax rises if he won May's Scottish Parliament election."
Just to clarify...
"To emphasise the point, freezing Council Tax was a Tory policy before it was SNP policy. Because Tories hate taxes and hate public services. Strange that the "left wing" SNP agrees."
Michty, does that mean the "left wing" Labour party do too?
I think he's wrong. It's populist ( which is why the SNP took it over from the Tories0 but it's not a sensible policy in terms of delivering services or of local democracy.
Braveheart how much of a donkey are you. I've had my council tax frozen since 2005 - 2 yrs before the SNP took office.
I live in Glasgow - a Labour fiefdom.
It wasn't a Tory policy you are thinking about rate capping.
Observer, "donkey".
You know I'm almost never personal in my comments, I don't do insults.
It's a good policy if you want to win arguments.
Almost never, isn't quite good enough Councillor Alex.
Sorry to see you slip up on Newsnet yesterday, this old technology can be quite confuddling at the best of times.
Now your views on this here blog do they belong to yourself, the Labour Party in North Ayrshire or are they representative of your constituents in Ward 8?
You should know, Mark.
I don't express any views other than my own.
I am unable to log in to that other site that caused all the trouble, so I'll answer that question asked there and (I think) here.
I would prefer a Labour Government at Westminster and a Labour Government at Holyroood.
I would also prefer those decent left of centre folks who waste their time and the political energy of the country on chasing an independence that will never happen and if it it did would be a disaster, to join with me in addressing the needs of the Scottish people and solving the problems now, rather than waiting for some distant Utopia.
Presumably by 'that other site' you mean Newsnet. I can't imagine it caused any trouble, merely that you boobed in the signing in process.
I don't believe the question was asked here, further investigation reveals that you haven't really answered it either. For the prpose of clarity I'll repeat.
"Would you prefer a Tory government in London or an independent Scotland with a Labour Government"?
It's a simple enough question, which goes to heart of your deliberate linguistic misdirection.
Talking of which my proverbial bunnet is doffed in your direction for this exemplar of the art of political obfuscation.
"I would also prefer those decent left of centre folks who waste their time and the political energy of the country on chasing an independence that will never happen and if it it did would be a disaster, to join with me in addressing the needs of the Scottish people and solving the problems now, rather than waiting for some distant Utopia."
Break that down and it's truly remarkable.
1.Decent
2.Waste
3.Chasing
4.Never happen
5.Disaster
6.Join me
7.Addressing needs
8.Solving problems
9.Waiting
10.Distant Utopia
You simultaneously praise, recruit, belittle, diminish, criticise, prophecise, deify yourself and ultimately dash the hopes of somewhere between one-third and a half of those who choose to live here. What makes it exceptional is that you do it with not one scintilla of evidence.
Being freed from a pseudonym is quite refreshing. I look forward to reading your bon mots in future on Councillor Alex Gallagher's blog.
It's a false choice, and I am under no compulsion to choose either of the offered options when other options are available.
If I said to you "would you prefer to be hit over the head by a hammer or a shovel?", you might resonably say: "neither thanks". Me too.
Glad you admire my prose. It is rather well expressed, if I say so myself :)
"Councillor Alex Gallagher's blog"
and then Braveheart's gas was suddenly turned down to a wee peep. Shame
This councillor Gallagher "brave" chap is a wee confusion.
He wants a Labour Government at Westminster as a way to forward a progressive, left of centre agenda?
Would that be the Iraq invading, nuclear WMD buying, WMD dossier sexing, 10p tax abolishing, NHS privatising, PPI and tuition fee initiating, expense sleazing left of centre agenda that we have just seen during 13 years of Labour government?
It would be better if decent left of centre types stopped wasting their time and ours by chasing after the myth of a left of centre Labour London government which hasn't happened despite there having been a Labour London Government for the past decade and more and won't happen anytime soon, and used their political energies for the betterment of Scotland.
And of course councillors shouldn't waste taxpayer cash blogging drivel from council offices.
Ohh I'm sure he'll be back to set us on the righteous path to slavish devotion to those folk that know what's bestest for us...
Yes Mark...for what would we do without people like that to look out for us?
Headless chickens with criminal tendencies spring to mind. We're obviously genetically attuned to failure...
Is Braveheart Alex Gallagher?
I remember you from the Herald Councillor you were a frequent poster then.
I should have recognised your circular style of argument straight away.
You were always persistent in it, but we never reached the end.
Circular arguments are like that.
He is indeed. An unfortunate technological faux pas on Newsnet saw poor councillor Gallagher comment under his eponymous titled email address...
In light of the potential apocalypse in Japan, I'd like to hear Councillor Gallagher's take on Hunterston 'B' whose stakeholder group he currently sits on...
http://www.largsandmillportnews.com/news/largs/articles/2011/03/02/410834-has-salmond-undermined-his-candidate-kenny/
http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/aberdeen/a-new-labour-king-canute-1.330656
In response to Ayrshire Scot, the Cooncillor's dewey eyed longing for a left of centre Labour Party governing Scotland beggars belief. They have had 13 years or so to do it but never managed to get passed the filling of the sea boots stage.
I was watching BBC World yesterday and saw President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran denouncing the line taken by the ruling family in Bahrain against the protesters. He said that the Bahrainies, who were protesting their lack of democracy, were met with bullets and represion.
Here was me thinking that the Iranians, did not do irony.
It seems that Cooncillor Gallacher does it quite well.
Nice wee piece in today's Scottish Review, by Walter Hume, about the endemic corruption within the Labour local Government in Scotland.
http://www.scottishreview.net/WalterHumes98.shtml
Where oh where has the Brave "Braveheart" gone? As a council tax payer in Ayrshire, and a tax payer, I want to know if that chap posted his party politics from a council office?
I shall be be writing to the council with Councillor "BravehearT" Gallagher's details and a freedom of information request.
http://www.north-ayrshire.gov.uk/na/ContactUs.nsf/ContactUs?OpenForm&Category=Complaint
Monty
I trust you do not mind, I have popped in a freedom of info/ public service complaint to North Ayrshire council, about potential party political postings to this, or a blog spot writtem by councillor Gallagher. As an Ayshire council tax payer I feel our elected officials should not be using tax payer resource such as computers or broadband to further their party agenda. I have asked the council to look at Councillor Gallagher's use of the internet from council offices or council paid/ subsidised or expensed connections, but any info on the IP source of his contributions here may be useful
Me, I'm just a sensible, moderate, fellow, who thinks that the Tories have the wrong recipe for a decent society. Even when they correctly identify the problem, they always get the wrong solution. I also believe that chasing Scottish independence is a sad waste of time and energy. I think that invading Iraq and spending £100 billion on nuclear weapons is the way forward, and I often (very often) use council tax payer funded facilities to say so.
Good grief, Councillor Braveheart seems to adopting Libyan tactics! He won't answer a simple question, refers it to lawyers....what a Stalinist
Post a Comment